AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sahin, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sahin, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:253-257
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast

Mammographic and Sonographic Features

Declan G. Sheppard1, Gary J. Whitman1, Bruno D. Fornage1, Carol B. Stelling1, Phan T. Huynh2 and Aysegul A. Sahin3

1 Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 57, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Houston, TX 77030.
2 Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 6411 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030.
3 Division of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to define specific mammographic and sonographic features of tubular carcinoma of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventeen pathologically confirmed cases of tubular carcinoma were characterized retrospectively by two radiologists. Mammograms and sonograms were available for all patients.

RESULTS. Fifteen of the 17 tubular carcinomas appeared as irregularly shaped masses with spiculated margins on mammography. Sixteen of the 17 masses had central densities. Spicules longer than the diameter of the central lesion were noted in eight (53%) of 15 tubular carcinomas. Eight tubular carcinomas had associated calcifications, with calcifications suspected of being malignant in four cases. On sonography, 15 hypoechoic masses were seen. The margins of the masses on sonography were described as ill-defined in 14 (93%) of the 15 cases. Posterior acoustic shadowing was present in 14 of the 15 cases.

CONCLUSION. Tubular carcinomas are usually seen on mammography as irregularly shaped masses with central densities and spiculated margins, and most tubular carcinomas can be identified on sonography as hypoechoic masses with ill-defined margins and posterior acoustic shadowing. Although the mammographic and sonographic features of tubular carcinoma are not sufficiently specific to differentiate tubular carcinomas from radial scars, sonography can be useful for guiding biopsies and evaluating for multifocal and multicentric disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey
Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Malich, D. Sauner, C. Marx, M. Facius, T. Boehm, S. O. Pfleiderer, M. Fleck, and W. A. Kaiser
Influence of Breast Lesion Size and Histologic Findings on Tumor Detection Rate of a Computer-aided Detection System
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 851 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.