AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gale, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gale, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:33-36
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Computers in Radiology

An Automated PACS Workstation Interface

A Timesaving Enhancement

Daniel R. Gale1,2, M. Elon Gale1, Rebecca K. Schwartz1, Victorine V. Muse1 and Richard E. Walker1

1 Radiology Service (114), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, 150 S. Huntington Ave. Boston, MA 02130.
2 Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02130.

OBJECTIVE. Interface design is a key element in the efficient use of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstation. In many cases, multiple mouse clicks or keyboard commands are required to open and close a case, to mark it as complete, and to retrieve and allocate screen positions to the next case. We evaluated the work flow effect of software designed for automated image display in which all of these operations are consolidated in a single mouse click.

CONCLUSION. Automated image display increases efficiency in image interpretation and remedies the normally cluttered presentation environment. At our institution, acceptance of automated image display has been overwhelmingly positive. In fact, automated image display has improved radiologist productivity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C.-S. Yam, A. Sitek, V. Raptopoulos, and M. Larson
A Simple Method for Extracting DICOM Images from a Magnetooptic Disk
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 529 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. I. Reiner, E. L. Siegel, F. J. Hooper, S. Pomerantz, A. Dahlke, and D. Rallis
Radiologists' Productivity in the Interpretation of CT Scans: A Comparison of PACS with Conventional Film
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 861 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.