AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Best, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Best, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 174:393-399
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MR Imaging of the Distribution and Location of Acute Hamstring Injuries in Athletes

Arthur A. De Smet1 and Thomas M. Best2

1 Department of Radiology, E3/311, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252.
2 Department of Family Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin Athletic Department, 621 Science Dr., Madison, WI 53711.

OBJECTIVE. Although hamstring injuries are common in athletes, the distribution and location of such injuries have not been well defined. We used MR imaging to determine the frequency of injury by muscle, involvement of one or more muscles, and location of injuries within the musculotendinous unit.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed MR imaging on 15 consecutive college athletes with clinically diagnosed acute hamstring injuries. A hamstring injury was diagnosed and located on MR imaging by identifying high signal intensity within the muscle on T2-weighted images.

RESULTS. We found that 10 athletes had injuries of a single muscle with six injuries of the biceps femoris, three of the semitendinosus, and one of the semimembranosus. In an additional five athletes, we found primary injuries of the biceps femoris and secondary injuries of the semitendinosus. The injuries occurred in diverse locations within the muscles including five injuries at the proximal musculotendinous junction, two at the distal musculotendinous junction, four within the proximal half of the muscle belly, and four in the distal half. All eight intramuscular injuries were located at the musculotendinous junction within the muscle.

CONCLUSION. The biceps femoris is the most commonly injured hamstring muscle and the semitendinosus is the second most commonly injured. Although hamstring injuries often involve one muscle injured proximally, multiple muscles were involved in 33% of athletes (5/15) and the injuries were distal in 40% of athletes (6/15). All intramuscular injuries occurred at the musculotendinous junction, either at the ends of the muscle or within the muscle belly.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. Zeren, H. H. Oztekin, H. Boya, and O. Ozcan
Symptomatic Entrapment of an Anomalous Semimembranosus Muscle by the Semitendinosus Tendon in a Professional Soccer Player: A Case Report
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2009; 37(10): 2049 - 2052.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. G. Wood, I. Packham, S. P. Trikha, and J. Linklater
Avulsion of the Proximal Hamstring Origin
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2008; 90(11): 2365 - 2374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Sarimo, L. Lempainen, K. Mattila, and S. Orava
Complete Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: A Series of 41 Patients With Operative Treatment
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1110 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Gyftopoulos, Z. S. Rosenberg, M. E. Schweitzer, and M. Bordalo-Rodrigues
Normal Anatomy and Strains of the Deep Musculotendinous Junction of the Proximal Rectus Femoris: MRI Features
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): W182 - W186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. M. Askling, M. Tengvar, T. Saartok, and A. Thorstensson
Acute First-Time Hamstring Strains During Slow-Speed Stretching: Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Recovery Characteristics
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1716 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. M. Askling, M. Tengvar, T. Saartok, and A. Thorstensson
Acute First-Time Hamstring Strains During High-Speed Running: A Longitudinal Study Including Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Doda, W C G Peh, and A Chawla
Symptomatic accessory soleus muscle: diagnosis and follow-up on magnetic resonance imaging.
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2006; 79(946): e129 - e132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. E. Schneider-Kolsky, J. L. Hoving, P. Warren, and D. A. Connell
A Comparison Between Clinical Assessment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Hamstring Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 1008 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
C Askling, T Saartok, and A Thorstensson
Type of acute hamstring strain affects flexibility, strength, and time to return to pre-injury level
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. A. H. Jarvinen, T. L. N. Jarvinen, M. Kaariainen, H. Kalimo, and M. Jarvinen
Muscle Injuries: Biology and Treatment
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2005; 33(5): 745 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. Koulouris and D. Connell
Hamstring Muscle Complex: An Imaging Review
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 571 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. A. Connell, M. E. Schneider-Kolsky, J. L. Hoving, F. Malara, R. Buchbinder, G. Koulouris, F. Burke, and C. Bass
Longitudinal Study Comparing Sonographic and MRI Assessments of Acute and Healing Hamstring Injuries
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 975 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. M. Cross, N. Gibbs, M. T. Houang, and M. Cameron
Acute Quadriceps Muscle Strains: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Prognosis
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2004; 32(3): 710 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. Slavotinek, G. M. Verrall, and G. T. Fon
Hamstring Injury in Athletes: Using MR Imaging Measurements to Compare Extent of Muscle Injury with Amount of Time Lost from Competition
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1621 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. E. Klingele and P. I. Sallay
Surgical Repair of Complete Proximal Hamstring Tendon Rupture
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2002; 30(5): 742 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.