AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leung, J. W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leung, J. W. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 174:745-752
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Efficacy of Step-Oblique Mammography for Confirmation and Localization of Densities Seen on Only One Standard Mammographic View

Kathryn L. Pearson1, Edward A. Sickles, Steven D. Frankel and Jessica W. T. Leung

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco, Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94143.

OBJECTIVE. Step-oblique mammography is a technique used to determine with confidence whether a mammographic finding visible on multiple images on only one projection (but not elucidated using standard additional mammographic projections such as the roll view) represents a summation artifact or a true mass, and to precisely localize the true mass for further evaluation (if applicable). This paper describes the step-oblique technique and evaluates its efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1998, 69 consecutive women underwent step-oblique mammography for the evaluation of densities seen on multiple images in only one standard projection. Additional images were obtained at 15° stepped increments in obliquity. If a one-projection-only finding was not seen on step-oblique images, the density was judged to represent a summation artifact, completing the examination. If a density was visualized and could be triangulated concordantly on step-oblique images ranging from the craniocaudal to the 90° lateral projection, then it was judged to represent a real lesion. Such a lesion was further characterized (mass, neodensity, architectural distortion, focal asymmetric density) and was localized precisely in three dimensions, permitting imaging-guided tissue diagnosis, if appropriate. For all study patients, we also recorded BI-RADS (American College of Radiology Breast Imaging and Data Reporting System) assessment categories; pathology results for biopsied lesions; and mammographic follow-up, clinical follow-up, and linkage to regional tumor registry for nonbiopsied lesions for which at least 2 years had elapsed since step-oblique mammography.

RESULTS. Step-oblique mammography differentiated 50 real lesions from 19 summation artifacts. All 50 real lesions, although initially visible on only one standard projection, were successfully localized in three dimensions. Subsequent management resulted in the prompt detection and diagnosis of seven breast cancers and 21 benign lesions. None of the remaining findings managed by follow-up rather than biopsy have subsequently been found to be malignant.

CONCLUSION. Step-oblique mammography is an effective means of evaluating the mammographic finding visible on multiple images on only one standard projection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Moy, K. Elias, V. Patel, J. Lee, J. S. Babb, H. K. Toth, and C. L. Mercado
Is Breast MRI Helpful in the Evaluation of Inconclusive Mammographic Findings?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 986 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey, B. T. Nicholson, and M. A. Cohen
Finding Early Invasive Breast Cancers: A Practical Approach
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 61 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Majid, E. S. de Paredes, R. D. Doherty, N. R. Sharma, and X. Salvador
Missed Breast Carcinoma: Pitfalls and Pearls
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 881 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Wells, D. Rupley, E. A. Sickles, K. L. Pearson, S. D. Frankel, and J. W. T. Leung
What Should Be Done First in the Imaging Workup of Densities Seen on Only One Standard Mammographic View: Diagnostic Mammography or Sonography?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 545 - 546.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.