| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC
27710
2
Department of Radiology, Rush Medical Center, 1750 Harrison St., Chicago, IL
60612
3
Biometry Division, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3958, Durham, NC
27710
OBJECTIVE. We determined the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for patients with treated lung cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined patients who underwent FDG PET after first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. FDG PET results were correlated with survival rates to determine whether FDG PET findings were predictive of outcomes.
RESULTS. After initial therapy, 113 patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent FDG PET. One hundred patients had positive FDG PET results and a median survival of 12 months (95% confidence interval, 9.2-15.4). Thirteen patients had negative FDG PET results, and 11 (85%) of these patients are still living at a median follow-up of 34 months. The difference in survival for patients with positive and negative FDG PET results was statistically significant (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION. FDG PET has prognostic value and strongly correlates with survival rates of patients with treated lung cancer. Patients with positive FDG PET results have a significantly worse prognosis than patients with negative results. Additionally, FDG PET may be helpful in guiding therapeutic treatments.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Hicks Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 31S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Erasmus, E. Rohren, and S. G. Swisher Prognosis and Reevaluation of Lung Cancer by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Proceedings of the ATS, April 15, 2009; 6(2): 171 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. K. Hoang, L. F. Hoagland, R. E. Coleman, A. D. Coan, J. E. Herndon II, and E. F. Patz Jr Prognostic Value of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Advanced-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1459 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Bunyaviroch and R. E. Coleman PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 451 - 469. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Hoekstra, S. G. Stroobants, E. F. Smit, J. Vansteenkiste, H. van Tinteren, P. E. Postmus, R. P. Golding, B. Biesma, F. J.H.M. Schramel, N. van Zandwijk, et al. Prognostic Relevance of Response Evaluation Using [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8362 - 8370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. K. Shankar and D. C. Sullivan Functional Imaging in Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3203 - 3211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Hellwig, T. P. Graeter, D. Ukena, T. Georg, C.-M. Kirsch, and H.-J. Schafers Value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinoma J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2004; 128(6): 892 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. C. Detterbeck, J. F. Vansteenkiste, D. E. Morris, C. A. Dooms, A. H. Khandani, and M. A. Socinski Seeking a Home for a PET, Part 3: Emerging Applications of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in the Management of Patients With Lung Cancer Chest, November 1, 2004; 126(5): 1656 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Schrevens, N. Lorent, C. Dooms, and J. Vansteenkiste The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 633 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K. Buck, G. Glatting, and S. N. Reske Quantification of 18F-FDG Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Feasible Prognostic Marker? J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1274 - 1276. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Halter, A. K. Buck, H. Schirrmeister, I. Wurziger, F. Liewald, G. Glatting, B. Neumaier, L. Sunder-Plassmann, S. N. Reske, and M. Hetzel [18F] 3-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: Alternative or diagnostic adjunct to 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the workup of suspicious central focal lesions? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1093 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Pfister, D. H. Johnson, C. G. Azzoli, W. Sause, T. J. Smith, S. Baker Jr, J. Olak, D. Stover, J. R. Strawn, A. T. Turrisi, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003 J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 330 - 353. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. H. Kernstine Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: can it be used to accurately stage the mediastinum in non-small cell lung cancer as an alternative to mediastinoscopy? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1700 - 1703. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. V. Gonzalez-Stawinski, A. Lemaire, F. Merchant, E. O'Halloran, R. E. Coleman, D. H. Harpole, and T. A. D'Amico A comparative analysis of positron emission tomography and mediastinoscopy in staging non-small cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1900 - 1904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Mac Manus, R. J. Hicks, J. P. Matthews, A. McKenzie, D. Rischin, E. K. Salminen, and D. L. Ball Positron Emission Tomography Is Superior to Computed Tomography Scanning for Response-Assessment After Radical Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2003; 21(7): 1285 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Kostakoglu and S. J. Goldsmith 18F-FDG PET Evaluation of the Response to Therapy for Lymphoma and for Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Carcinoma J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 224 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Wittram, A. J. Fischman, E. Mark, J. Ko, and J.-A. O. Shepard Thymic Enlargement and FDG Uptake in Three Patients: CT and FDG Positron Emission Tomography Correlated with Pathology Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 519 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. L. Colice, J. Rubins, and M. Unger Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative-Intent Therapy Chest, January 1, 2003; 123 (2009): 272S - 283S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Hicks, V. Kalff, M. P. MacManus, R. E. Ware, A. F. McKenzie, J. P. Matthews, and D. L. Ball The Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Suspected Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Potentially Curative Therapy: Impact on Management and Prognostic Stratification J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2001; 42(11): 1605 - 1613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.F. Vansteenkiste and S.G. Stroobants The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. W. McCain, D. P. Dunagan, R. Chin Jr., T. Oaks, B. A. Harkness, and E. F. Haponik The Usefulness of Positron Emission Tomography in Evaluating Patients for Pulmonary Malignancies Chest, December 1, 2000; 118(6): 1610 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
