AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:853-857
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Cerebral Infarctions

Evaluation with Single-Axis Versus Trace Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

M. Castillo1, S. K. Mukherji, D. Isaacs and J. K. Smith

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Campus Box 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to determine the usefulness of single-axis diffusion-weighted imaging versus trace diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of cerebral infarctions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-six patients harboring 34 infarctions were examined using single-axis and trace diffusion-weighted imaging within 48 hr of the onset of symptoms. Two neuroradiologists who were not aware of the clinical findings reviewed all images obtained with both techniques and noted the following: type of infarction (small [<15 mm] versus territorial), location of infarction, presence of infarction (see only on single-axis images, seen only on trace images, seen on both), lesion conspicuity (better on single-axis images, better on trace images, or equal on both), and lesion size (larger on single-axis images, larger on trace images, or equal on both). Differences in opinion were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS. Of the 18 small and 16 territorial infarctions, all were identified on both single-axis and trace imaging. Lesion conspicuity was judged to be slightly better on trace images for both types of infarctions. Lesion size was judged to be larger on single-axis images for territorial infarctions.

CONCLUSION. Both single-axis and trace diffusion-weighted imaging showed all small and territorial cerebral infarctions. Both types of infarctions were slightly larger on single-axis images but this did not affect correct interpretation in any case. The single-axis technique provided sufficient information for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction in our clinical settings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
N. Evangelou, D. Konz, M. M. Esiri, S. Smith, J. Palace, and P. M. Matthews
Regional axonal loss in the corpus callosum correlates with cerebral white matter lesion volume and distribution in multiple sclerosis
Brain, September 1, 2000; 123(9): 1845 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.