AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berger, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 174:1005-1008
© American Roentgen Ray Society


FDG PET Evaluation of Mucinous Neoplasms

Correlation of FDG Uptake with Histopathologic Features

Kevin L. Berger1, Siobhan A. Nicholson2, Farrokh Dehdashti1 and Barry A. Siegel1

1 Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110.
2 Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to assess the sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the detection of mucinous carcinoma and to determine the histologic features of these tumors that may affect lesion detectability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of all patients with mucinous carcinoma who had undergone FDG PET at our institution from 1995 through 1998 identified 25 patients with new or recurrent mucinous carcinoma at the time of PET. In 22 of these patients, tissue specimens available from either core biopsy or surgical resection allowed detailed histologic analysis.

RESULTS. FDG PET revealed mucinous carcinoma in only 13 (59%) of 22 patients, resulting in an unusually high percentage (41%) of false-negative results. Two histologic features were found to be predictive of FDG PET results: tumor cellularity (p = 0.011) and the amount of mucin within the tumor mass (p = 0.009). There was a positive correlation between tumor FDG uptake and cellularity but a negative correlation with the amount of mucin.

CONCLUSION. FDG PET is limited in the evaluation of mucinous tumors, particularly in hypocellular lesions with abundant mucin.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
J. K. Schwarz, P. W. Grigsby, F. Dehdashti, and D. Delbeke
The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 64S - 73S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Belcher, A. G. Nicholson, D. M. Hansell, and P. Goldstraw
Imaging Characteristics of a Mucinous Colorectal Pulmonary Metastasis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1698 - 1698.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
B. Goudarzi, H. A. Jacene, and R. L. Wahl
Diagnosis and Differentiation of Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma from Adenocarcinoma with Bronchioloalveolar Components with Metabolic and Anatomic Characteristics Using PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1585 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend
PET/CT: Form and Function
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Blake, A. Singh, B. N. Setty, J. Slattery, M. Kalra, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, A. J. Fischman, and P. R. Mueller
Pearls and Pitfalls in Interpretation of Abdominal and Pelvic PET-CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1335 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. H. Khandani and R. C. Semelka
Can the Relation between Gadopentetate Dimeglumine and FDG Uptake in Colorectal Liver Metastases Be Used Clinically?
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, A. J. Fischman, R. Kadavigere, M. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and S. Saini
Detection of Liver Metastases from Adenocarcinoma of the Colon and Pancreas: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium-Enhanced Liver MRI and Whole-Body FDG PET
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 239 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. K. Cheran, N. D. Nielsen, and E. F. Patz Jr.
False-Negative Findings for Primary Lung Tumors on FDG Positron Emission Tomography: Staging and Prognostic Implications
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1129 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, S. M. Larson, and H. W.D. Yeung
PET/CT in Oncology: Integration into Clinical Management of Lymphoma, Melanoma, and Gastrointestinal Malignancies
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2004; 45(90010): 72S - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Cohade, M. Osman, J. Leal, and R. L. Wahl
Direct Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1797 - 1803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. A. Zealley, S. J. Skehan, J. Rawlinson, G. Coates, C. Nahmias, and S. Somers
Selection of Patients for Resection of Hepatic Metastases: Improved Detection of Extrahepatic Disease with FDG PET
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S55 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Nakamoto, T. Saga, T. Ishimori, M. Mamede, K. Togashi, T. Higuchi, M. Mandai, S. Fujii, H. Sakahara, and J. Konishi
Clinical Value of Positron Emission Tomography with FDG for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1449 - 1454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.