AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Korobkin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Korobkin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 174:1025-1030
© American Roentgen Ray Society


CT of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcomas

Ashok K. Gupta1, Richard H. Cohan1, Isaac R. Francis1, Vernon K. Sondak2 and Melvyn Korobkin1

1 Department of Radiology B1D502G, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030.
2 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030.

OBJECTIVE. We reviewed the medical records and CT scans of 33 patients with recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas to determine the patterns of recurrent disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the medical records and CT examinations obtained at the time the recurrence was diagnosed and tabulated data for all patients. Data for patients with high-grade malignancies were compared with those of patients with low-grade malignancies to determine whether there were differences in the interval between initial tumor resection and recurrence. We also compared CT appearances to determine patterns of recurrent disease.

RESULTS. Twenty-five of 33 recurrences were detected within 2 years of initial surgery. Only 16 patients had symptoms, and when present, most symptoms were nonspecific. In 28 (85%) patients, recurrent tumor was in the abdomen at the time of diagnosis. In nine patients, the largest detectable abdominal tumor was less than 5 cm in diameter. Interval to recurrence was similar for patients with low- and high-grade tumors. Although the CT appearance was similar for both grades, distant metastases were identified only in patients with high-grade malignancies.

CONCLUSION. Primary retroperitoneal malignancies frequently recur within 2 years of initial surgical resection. For asymptomatic patients, diagnosis is typically made during routine follow-up CT. Most patients have abdominal recurrences that may be small when first detected.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Y. Kim, S.-J. Kim, D. Choi, S. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, H. K. Lim, and S. Y. Song
Recurrence of Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: Imaging Findings and Growth Rates at Follow-Up CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1841 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.