HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chung, H.-W. Articles by Huang, Y.-H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chung, H.-W. Articles by Huang, Y.-H. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Fractal Analysis of Nuclear Medicine Images for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Emphysema

Interpretations, Implications, and Limitations

¹ Department of Electrical Engineering, Rm. 238, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan 10764, R. O. C.
² Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R. O. C.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate, on images obtained in nuclear medicine examinations, the physical meanings and consequent implications of fractal analysis developed in a recent study that was reported to be effective in quantifying the heterogeneous distribution of carbon particle radioaerosol in the lungs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fractal dimensions were computed for 108 sets of radionuclide imaging data from 28 patients according to the methods in a previous report, and were then correlated with the ratio of tissue areas segmented at two thresholds (15% and 35% of maximal radioactivity).

RESULTS. Fractal dimension was found to linearly correlate with the ratio natural logarithm of tissue areas segmented at two different threshold levels (n = 108, r = 0.999), with regression slope accurately predicted (error = 0.06%). Bland-Altman analysis showed that fractal dimensions ranging from 0.2 to 1.9 can be explained by this area ratio with disagreement of only 5.13% at two standard deviations; thus, fractal dimension seems to be an over-simplified parameter unrelated to spatial heterogeneity of radioaerosol distribution.

CONCLUSION. The analysis of this study suggested that the fractal dimension defined in a previous report was limited to the indication of the percentage area of low-radioactivity regions with respect to total tissue area in the image. Because the fractal dimension partially reflects, but is not specific to, a certain degree of focal spots of low radioactivity, we suggest using fractal analysis in clinical practice only with careful control and thorough understanding of the physical meanings.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Thie A Simple Interpretation of Fractal Analysis of Images J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 724 - 724. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-W. Chung Blood Flow Heterogeneity Versus Cerebral Hypoperfusion Revealed by Fractal Analysis on 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1874 - 1874. [Full Text]

				H.-W. Chung and M. Nagao Fractal Analysis of Nuclear Medicine Images Again: Validity and Interpretation of Results from New Analysis Methods J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 316 - 317. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Scott Pulmonary Perfusion Patterns and Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 513 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-W. Chung and M. Nagao The Severity of Pulmonary Emphysema Investigated with Fractal Analysis: Regional Dependence J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2001; 42(1): 177 - 178. [Full Text] [PDF]