HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cotten, A. Articles by Gougeon, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cotten, A. Articles by Gougeon, F. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

MR Imaging of the Knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T

Correlation with Surgery

¹ Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital R. Salengro, Blvd. du Pr. J. Leclercq, 59037 Lille, France.
² Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital R. Salengro, Blvd. du Pr. J. Leclercq, 59037 Lille, France.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of low- and high-field-strength MR imagers in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 219 patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee, MR imaging at 0.2 and 1.5 T was performed with similar sequences. Only patients with surgically confirmed diagnosis (n = 90) were included in the statistical analysis. Radiologists were unaware of diagnosis and field strength. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and inter- and intraobserver variability were determined.

RESULTS. There was excellent correlation between the field strengths in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus tears. Accuracy for medial meniscus, lateral meniscus, and anterior cruciate ligament tears was 91-93%, 88-90%, and 93-96%, respectively, at 0.2 T and 91-94%, 91-93%, and 97-98%, respectively, at 1.5 T. Inter- and intraobserver variability values showed excellent correlation ( > 0.8).

CONCLUSION. The level of diagnostic accuracy in anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears is comparable for low- and high-field-strength MR imagers.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Boks, D. Vroegindeweij, B. W. Koes, M. G. M. Hunink, and S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra Follow-up of Posttraumatic Ligamentous and Meniscal Knee Lesions Detected at MR Imaging: Systematic Review Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 863 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. G. Oei, J. J. Nikken, A. C. M. Verstijnen, A. Z. Ginai, and M. G. Myriam Hunink MR Imaging of the Menisci and Cruciate Ligaments: A Systematic Review Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 837 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Dubrulle, J. Delomez, A. Kiaei, P. Berger, C. Vincent, F.-M. M. Vaneecloo, and L. Lemaitre Mass Screening for Retrocochlear Disorders: Low-Field-Strength (0.2-T) versus High-Field-Strength (1.5-T) MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2002; 23(6): 918 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Bredella, C. Losasso, S. C. Moelleken, R. W. Huegli, H. K. Genant, and P. F. J. Tirman Three-Point Dixon Chemical-Shift Imaging for Evaluating Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint on a Low-Field-Strength Open Magnet Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1371 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]