AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cotten, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gougeon, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cotten, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gougeon, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 174:1093-1097
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MR Imaging of the Knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T

Correlation with Surgery

Anne Cotten1, Emmanuelle Delfaut1, Xavier Demondion1, Franck Lapègue1, Mokran Boukhelifa1, Nathalie Boutry1, Patrick Chastanet1 and François Gougeon2

1 Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital R. Salengro, Blvd. du Pr. J. Leclercq, 59037 Lille, France.
2 Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital R. Salengro, Blvd. du Pr. J. Leclercq, 59037 Lille, France.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of low- and high-field-strength MR imagers in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 219 patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee, MR imaging at 0.2 and 1.5 T was performed with similar sequences. Only patients with surgically confirmed diagnosis (n = 90) were included in the statistical analysis. Radiologists were unaware of diagnosis and field strength. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and inter- and intraobserver variability were determined.

RESULTS. There was excellent correlation between the field strengths in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus tears. Accuracy for medial meniscus, lateral meniscus, and anterior cruciate ligament tears was 91-93%, 88-90%, and 93-96%, respectively, at 0.2 T and 91-94%, 91-93%, and 97-98%, respectively, at 1.5 T. Inter- and intraobserver variability values showed excellent correlation ({kappa} > 0.8).

CONCLUSION. The level of diagnostic accuracy in anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears is comparable for low- and high-field-strength MR imagers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
R. C. Murray, T. S. Mair, C. E. Sherlock, and A. S. Blunden
Comparison of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance images of cadaver limbs of horses
Vet Rec., September 5, 2009; 165(10): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. J. Laundre, M. S. Collins, J. R. Bond, D. L. Dahm, M. J. Stuart, and J. N. Mandrekar
MRI Accuracy for Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus in Patients With Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and the Clinical Relevance of Missed Tears
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 515 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. S. Boks, D. Vroegindeweij, B. W. Koes, M. G. M. Hunink, and S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
Follow-up of Posttraumatic Ligamentous and Meniscal Knee Lesions Detected at MR Imaging: Systematic Review
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 863 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. H. G. Oei, J. J. Nikken, A. C. M. Verstijnen, A. Z. Ginai, and M. G. Myriam Hunink
MR Imaging of the Menisci and Cruciate Ligaments: A Systematic Review
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 837 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F. Dubrulle, J. Delomez, A. Kiaei, P. Berger, C. Vincent, F.-M. M. Vaneecloo, and L. Lemaitre
Mass Screening for Retrocochlear Disorders: Low-Field-Strength (0.2-T) versus High-Field-Strength (1.5-T) MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2002; 23(6): 918 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Bredella, C. Losasso, S. C. Moelleken, R. W. Huegli, H. K. Genant, and P. F. J. Tirman
Three-Point Dixon Chemical-Shift Imaging for Evaluating Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint on a Low-Field-Strength Open Magnet
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1371 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.