| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine, 40 Tsukasamachi,
Gifu 500-8705, Japan.
2
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka 565-0871,
Japan.
OBJECTIVE. We compared radiologists' performance on combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging with their performance on helical CT during arterial portography (CTAP) and biphasic CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) for the preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. MR images and CT scans obtained in 33 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Images of the liver were reviewed on a segment-by-segment basis; a total of 261 segments with 39 hepatocellular carcinomas and 21 metastases were independently reviewed by three radiologists who were invited from outside institutions. Unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images were reviewed first, then ferumoxides-enhanced MR images were added for combined review. CTAP images and biphasic CTHA images were reviewed together.
RESULTS. Sensitivity for the detection of hepatic tumors was analogous for combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR images (86%) and for combined CTAP images and biphasic CTHA images (87%). Specificity was higher with MR images (95%, p < 0.01) than with CT images (91%). Radiologists' performances were improved (Az = 0.962, p = 0.0502) by combining ferumoxides-enhanced MR images with unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images (Az) = 0.950), and were analogous for combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR images and for combined CTAP images and biphasic CTHA images (Az = 0.959).
CONCLUSION. Radiologists' performances on combined unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging compared with their performances on combined helical CTAP and biphasic CTHA are analogous for the preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors. Such a dedicated combination of MR imaging may obviate the need for more invasive angiographically assisted helical CT for the preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. P. Hosch, S. M. Schmidt, S. Plaza, C. Dechow, J. Schmidt, S. Ley, G. W. Kauffmann, and J. Hansmann Comparison of CT during arterial portography and MR during arterial portography in the detection of liver metastases. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1502 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Lejeune, M. J. Bismuth, T. Conroy, C. Zanni, P. Bey, L. Bedenne, J. Faivre, P. Arveux, and F. Guillemin Use of a Decision Analysis Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the Management of Metachronous Liver Metastases of Colorectal Cancer J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2020 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J A Guthrie Cirrhosis and focal liver lesions: MRI findings Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 351 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-J. Kim, J. H. Kim, J.-J. Chung, M. S. Park, J. S. Lim, and Y. T. Oh Focal Hepatic Lesions: Detection and Characterization with Combination Gadolinium- and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 719 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Bluemke, T. M. Weber, D. Rubin, E. E. de Lange, R. Semelka, R. D. Redvanly, J. Chezmar, E. Outwater, R. Carlos, S. Saini, et al. Hepatic MR Imaging with Ferumoxides: Multicenter Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Injection Protocol Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 457 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Kim, T. K. Kim, K.-B. Sung, H.-K. Yoon, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, A. Y. Kim, H. J. Kim, and M.-G. Lee Preoperative Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Combined Use of CT with Arterial Portography and Hepatic Arteriography Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1593 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Frate, C. Zuiani, V. Londero, G. Como, M. Bazzocchi, K. Mortele, and P. R. Ros Comparing Levovist-Enhanced Pulse Inversion Harmonic Imaging and Ferumoxides-Enhanced MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1339 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kinkel, Y. Lu, M. Both, R. S. Warren, and R. F. Thoeni Detection of Hepatic Metastases from Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract by Using Noninvasive Imaging Methods (US, CT, MR Imaging, PET): A Meta-Analysis Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 748 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Coulam, F. P. Chan, and K. C. P. Li Can a Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Fast Spoiled Gradient-Recalled Echo Sequence Be Sufficient for Liver MR Imaging? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Lim, D. Choi, S. K. Cho, S. H. Kim, W. J. Lee, H. K. Lim, C. K. Park, S. W. Paik, and Y. I. Kim Conspicuity of Hepatocellular Nodular Lesions in Cirrhotic Livers at Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging: Importance of Kupffer Cell Number Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 669 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
