AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1251-1255
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Effect of Obesity on Screening Mammography

Outcomes Analysis of 88,346 Consecutive Examinations

Karen A. Hunt1,2 and Edward A. Sickles1

1 Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94143-1667.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., TC 2910F, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326.

OBJECTIVE. We determined differences in the rates of recall, biopsy, and cancer detection for screening mammography as a function of adiposity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty-eight thousand three hundred forty-six consecutive screening mammography examinations were performed from April 1985 to August 1997. Patient weights were normalized to ideal weight correcting for height and were subdivided into adiposity cohorts including underweight by greater than 10%; ideal weight ± 10%; overweight by 11-24%; overweight by 25-39%; and overweight by greater than 40%. The rates of recall, biopsy, cancer detection, and cancer stage were calculated and were analyzed using the chi-square test for trend. Cancer size was analyzed using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS. Reliable (p < 0.05) and meaningful differences were seen between cohorts of increasing adiposity for rates of recall, biopsy, and cancer detection. An increase in recall rate occurred with progressively increasing adiposity (3.88%, 4.89%, 5.11%, 5.47%, 5.55% [p < 0.0001]). The rate of biopsy also increased with increasing adiposity (0.98%, 1.31%, 1.35%, 1.59%, 1.65% [p < 0.0002]), as did the rate of screening-detected cancer (number of cases of cancer per 1000 women screened) (3.74, 4.29, 5.34, 4.70, 6.04 [p < 0.015]). Finally, increased adiposity also correlated with increased median cancer size (p < 0.02) and with more advanced stage at diagnosis (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION. Increasing adiposity correlates with progressive increases in the rates of recall, biopsy, and cancer detection for women undergoing screening mammography. Increasing adiposity also correlates with increased cancer size and stage, providing further support for obesity as a risk factor for breast cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
F. Sassi, H. S. Luft, and E. Guadagnoli
Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Female Breast Cancer: Screening Rates and Stage at Diagnosis
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 96(12): 2165 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
G. A. Porter, K. M. Inglis, L. A. Wood, and P. J. Veugelers
Effect of Obesity on Presentation of Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 13(3): 327 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. G. Elmore, P. A. Carney, L. A. Abraham, W. E. Barlow, J. R. Egger, J. S. Fosse, G. R. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D'Orsi, P. Paliwal, et al.
The Association Between Obesity and Screening Mammography Accuracy
Arch Intern Med, May 24, 2004; 164(10): 1140 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. A. Roubidoux, J. S. Kaur, K. A. Griffith, J. Sloan, C. Wilson, P. Novotny, and M. Lobell
Correlates of Mammogram Density in Southwestern Native-American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2003; 12(6): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. Demark-Wahnefried, B. L. Peterson, E. P. Winer, L. Marks, N. Aziz, P. K. Marcom, K. Blackwell, and B. K. Rimer
Changes in Weight, Body Composition, and Factors Influencing Energy Balance Among Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2381 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.