HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Völk, M. Articles by Link, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Völk, M. Articles by Link, J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of Renal Artery Stenosis

Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Variability

¹ All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 ± 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25° flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated.

RESULTS. Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography.

CONCLUSION. Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-A. Choi, S. H. Koh, S.-H. Hong, Y. H. Koh, J.-Y. Choi, and H. S. Kang Rheumatoid Arthritis and Tuberculous Arthritis: Differentiating MRI Features Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1347 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Soulez, M. Pasowicz, G. Benea, L. Grazioli, J. P. Niedmann, M. Konopka, P. C. Douek, G. Morana, F. K. W. Schaefer, A. Vanzulli, et al. Renal Artery Stenosis Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Angiography--Comparison with DSA Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 273 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. U. Herborn, V. M. Runge, D. M. Watkins, J. M. Gendron, and L. G. Naul MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Intraindividual Comparison of Double-Dose Contrast Enhancement at 1.5 T with Standard Dose at 3 T Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 173 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Prokop, G. Schneider, A. Vanzulli, M. Goyen, S. G. Ruehm, P. Douek, M. Dapra, G. Pirovano, M. A. Kirchin, and A. Spinazzi Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Blinded Multicenter Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 399 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gupta and R. Tello Accessory Renal Arteries Are Not Related to Hypertension Risk: A Review of MR Angiography Data Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1521 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Bude, A. R. Forauer, E. M. Caoili, and H. V. Nghiem Is It Necessary to Study Accessory Arteries When Screening the Renal Arteries for Renovascular Hypertension? Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 411 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Kroencke, M. N. Wasser, P. M. T. Pattynama, J. O. Barentsz, E. Grabbe, G. Marchal, M. V. Knopp, G. Schneider, L. Bonomo, D. J. Pennell, et al. Gadobenate Dimeglumine--Enhanced MR Angiography of the Abdominal Aorta and Renal Arteries Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1573 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Volk, M. Strotzer, M. Lenhart, J. Seitz, C. Manke, S. Feuerbach, and J. Link Renal Time-resolved MR Angiography: Quantitative Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine with Different Doses Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 484 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]