AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Völk, M.
Right arrow Articles by Link, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Völk, M.
Right arrow Articles by Link, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1583-1588
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of Renal Artery Stenosis

Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Variability

Markus Völk1, Michael Strotzer, Markus Lenhart, Christoph Manke, Wolfgang R. Nitz, Johannes Seitz, Stefan Feuerbach and Johann Link

1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 ± 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25° flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated.

RESULTS. Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography.

CONCLUSION. Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Soulez, M. Pasowicz, G. Benea, L. Grazioli, J. P. Niedmann, M. Konopka, P. C. Douek, G. Morana, F. K. W. Schaefer, A. Vanzulli, et al.
Renal Artery Stenosis Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Angiography--Comparison with DSA
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 273 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. U. Herborn, V. M. Runge, D. M. Watkins, J. M. Gendron, and L. G. Naul
MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Intraindividual Comparison of Double-Dose Contrast Enhancement at 1.5 T with Standard Dose at 3 T
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 173 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Prokop, G. Schneider, A. Vanzulli, M. Goyen, S. G. Ruehm, P. Douek, M. Dapra, G. Pirovano, M. A. Kirchin, and A. Spinazzi
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Blinded Multicenter Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 399 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Gupta and R. Tello
Accessory Renal Arteries Are Not Related to Hypertension Risk: A Review of MR Angiography Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1521 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. O. Bude, A. R. Forauer, E. M. Caoili, and H. V. Nghiem
Is It Necessary to Study Accessory Arteries When Screening the Renal Arteries for Renovascular Hypertension?
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. J. Kroencke, M. N. Wasser, P. M. T. Pattynama, J. O. Barentsz, E. Grabbe, G. Marchal, M. V. Knopp, G. Schneider, L. Bonomo, D. J. Pennell, et al.
Gadobenate Dimeglumine--Enhanced MR Angiography of the Abdominal Aorta and Renal Arteries
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1573 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Volk, M. Strotzer, M. Lenhart, J. Seitz, C. Manke, S. Feuerbach, and J. Link
Renal Time-resolved MR Angiography: Quantitative Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine with Different Doses
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 484 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.