AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 175:171-176
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Value of Dynamic MR Imaging in Assessing Endometrial Carcinoma Involvement of the Cervix

Hiroshi Seki1, Tooru Takano and Kunio Sakai

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Niigata University School of Medicine, 757, 1-Bancho, Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate endometrial carcinoma involvement of the cervix using dynamic MR imaging compared with T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 42 patients with endometrial carcinoma, T2-weighted MR imaging using rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement, dynamic MR imaging using gradient-echo sequences, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging using spin-echo sequences were performed before treatment. We evaluated patterns of enhancement in the cervix and tumor. In 39 of the 42 patients who underwent surgical treatment, we compared MR imaging findings with histologic results concerning cervical involvement.

RESULTS. Enhancement of the cervical epithelium was greater than that of the tumor and cervical stroma on dynamic MR imaging in most patients. In assessing cervical involvement, the accuracy of T2-weighted, dynamic, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging was 85%, 95%, and 90%, respectively; no statistically significant difference was observed. False-positive cases on T2-weighted MR imaging were correctly identified as having no cervical involvement on dynamic MR imaging using the finding of continuous enhancement of the cervical epithelium. We found this finding to be reliable in assessing tumor involvement of the cervix.

CONCLUSION. We believe that, in combination with T2-weighted MR imaging sequences, dynamic MR imaging is useful in assessing endometrial carcinoma involvement of the cervix.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Sala, S. Wakely, E. Senior, and D. Lomas
MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1577 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. J. Pijl, J. Doornbos, M. N. J. M. Wasser, H. C. van Houwelingen, R. A. E. M. Tollenaar, and J. L. Bloem
Quantitative Analysis of Focal Masses at MR Imaging: A Plea for Standardization
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 737 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Manfredi, P. Mirk, G. Maresca, P. A. Margariti, A. Testa, G. F. Zannoni, D. Giordano, G. Scambia, and P. Marano
Local-Regional Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma: Role of MR Imaging in Surgical Planning
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 372 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.