|
|
||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
OBJECTIVE. We determined the ability of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to differentiate benign and malignant pleural effusions in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Over a 6-year period, we reviewed all patients with primary nonsmall cell lung cancer and a pleural effusion on staging CT who underwent FDG PET. We examined 25 patients (18 men and seven women; age range, 37-86 years; mean age, 65 years). FDG PET revealed positive findings if pleural activity was greater than background mediastinal activity; FDG PET revealed negative findings if pleural activity was the same as or less than background mediastinal activity. Results of FDG PET were correlated with pathologic diagnosis determined with thoracentesis or pleural biopsy.
RESULTS. All patients had effusions on the same side as the primary tumor. Twenty-two patients had a malignant pleural effusion confirmed with thoracentesis (n = 19) or biopsy (n = 3). FDG PET revealed positive findings in 21 patients and negative findings in one. Three patients had no evidence of malignancy in the pleural space determined with cytologic findings (n = 2) or biopsy results (n = 1). FDG PET uptake revealed positive findings in one of these patients and negative findings in two. Therefore, of 22 patients with positive findings on FDG PET, 21 had pleural metastases, and of three patients with negative findings on FDG PET, one had metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FDG PET for detecting pleural metastases were 95%, 67%, 95%, 67%, and 92%, respectively.
CONCLUSION. This study suggests that FDG PET may be useful in improving staging evaluation in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and a pleural effusion. Increased pleural FDG uptake usually indicates pleural metastases; however, because the number of benign effusions studied was small, the relevance of negative findings on FDG PET in this setting is uncertain.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Heffner and J. S. Klein Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 235 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Silvestri, M. K. Gould, M. L. Margolis, L. T. Tanoue, D. McCrory, E. Toloza, and F. Detterbeck Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 178S - 201S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fischer, J Mortensen, S. Langer, A Loft, A. Berthelsen, B. Petersen, G Daugaard, U Lassen, and H. Hansen A prospective study of PET/CT in initial staging of small-cell lung cancer: comparison with CT, bone scintigraphy and bone marrow analysis Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 338 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Baumann Closed Pleural Biopsy: Not Dead Yet! Chest, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1398 - 1400. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bunyaviroch and R. E. Coleman PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 451 - 469. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Munden, S. S. Swisher, C. W. Stevens, and D. J. Stewart Imaging of the Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 803 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Schrevens, N. Lorent, C. Dooms, and J. Vansteenkiste The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 633 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Kwek, S. L. Aquino, and A. J. Fischman Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and CT After Talc Pleurodesis Chest, June 1, 2004; 125(6): 2356 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Schaffler, G. Wolf, H. Schoellnast, R. Groell, A. Maier, F. M. Smolle-Juttner, M. Woltsche, G. Fasching, R. Nicoletti, and R. M. Aigner Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Evaluation of Pleural Abnormalities on CT Scans with 18F FDG PET Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 858 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Rohren, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 305 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Pfister, D. H. Johnson, C. G. Azzoli, W. Sause, T. J. Smith, S. Baker Jr, J. Olak, D. Stover, J. R. Strawn, A. T. Turrisi, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003 J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 330 - 353. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Gupta, J. S. Rogers, G. M. Graeber, J. L. Gregory, U. Waheed, D. Mullet, and M. Atkins Clinical Role of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Lung Cancer and Suspected Malignant Pleural Effusion Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 1918 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ruffini, O. Rena, M. Bongiovanni, R. Cristofori, M. Mancuso, P. L. Filosso, M. Molinatti, and G. Maggi The significance of intraoperative pleural effusion during surgery for bronchogenic carcinoma Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 21(3): 508 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |