HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Islam, O. Articles by Babyn, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Islam, O. Articles by Babyn, P. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Development and Duration of Radiographic Signs of Bone Healing in Children

¹ Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kingston General Hospital, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Queen's University, 76 Stuart St., Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7 Canada.
² Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8 Canada.
³ Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedics, Kingston General Hospital, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7 Canada.

OBJECTIVE. Few articles report the evaluation of pediatric fracture healing and dating based on radiographic appearance. We established a timetable for expected radiographic changes visible during bone healing in otherwise healthy children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 707 radiographs of fractured forearms in 141 patients. Each fracture was assessed by a pediatric radiologist who was unaware of the timing of the initial injury. Assessment included the following features: fracture margins, fracture gap, periosteal reaction, callus, bridging, and remodeling. The time interval between injury and the appearance of the radiographic features and the duration of radiographic signs were determined and correlated with age, sex, angulation, displacement, and location.

RESULTS. Sclerosis at the fracture margins was evident in 85% of fractures 5 weeks after injury. Widening of the fracture gap was observed in 62% of fractures at 6 weeks. Periosteal reaction was evident on all images by 4 weeks, and after 7 weeks, periosteal reaction was separable from cortex in only 10% of fractures. Fracture callus had a density equal to or greater than that of adjacent cortex 10 weeks after injury in 90% of fractures.

CONCLUSION. A wide variation exists in the appearance and duration of the radiographic signs of bone healing. Marginal sclerosis should be an expected radiographic sign of normal bone healing. Applying maximum and minimum time spans to objective radiographic signs may aid in fracture dating.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Prosser, S. Maguire, S. K. Harrison, M. Mann, J. R. Sibert, A. M. Kemp, and Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group How Old Is This Fracture? Radiologic Dating of Fractures in Children: A Systematic Review Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1282 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Davis, F. R. Long, B. H. Adler, R. G. Castile, and S. Weinstein Lateral thoracic expansion for Jeune syndrome: evidence of rib healing and new bone formation Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 445 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Lonergan, A. M. Baker, M. K. Morey, and S. C. Boos From the Archives of the AFIP: Child Abuse: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 811 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]