| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Methodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, 1891 N. Senate Blvd.,
Ste. 700, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
2
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine,
635 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202.
3
Department of Radiology, Methodist Hospital, 1701 N. Senate Blvd.,
Indianapolis, IN 46202.
OBJECTIVE. Helical CT has become the preferred methodology for identifying urinary calculi. However, the ability to predict stone composition, which influences patient treatment, depends on the accurate measurement of the radiographic attenuation of stones. We studied the effects of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation width on the measurement of attenuation in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty-seven human urinary calculi of known composition and size were scanned at 120 kVp, 240 mA, and a 1:1 pitch at different collimations. A model, based on the physics of helical CT, was used to predict the effect of scan collimation width and stone size on measured attenuation.
RESULTS. At a 1-mm collimation, stone groups could be differentiated by attenuation: the attenuation of uric acid was less than that of cystine or struvite, which overlapped; these were less than the attenuation of calcium oxalate monohydrate, which was in turn lower than that of brushite and hydroxyapatite, which overlapped and showed the highest values. At a wider collimation, attenuation was lower and the ability to differentiate stone composition was lost. Attenuation also decreased with smaller stones. At a 10-mm collimation, some uric acid stones (<~6 mm) and other stones (<~4 mm) had very low attenuation, so low that they could remain undetected on helical CT. The model predicted well the degree that attenuation was affected by stone size and collimation width.
CONCLUSION. Stone composition and stone size, relative to CT collimation, independently influenced CT attenuation. The effect of stone size and collimation generally conformed to the model's predictions. We determined that small stones with low attenuation can be overlooked on helical CT.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. SHIMIZU and H. HORI The Prevalence of Nephrolithiasis in Patients with Primary Gout: A Cross-sectional Study Using Helical Computed Tomography J Rheumatol, September 1, 2009; 36(9): 1958 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. T. Boll, N. A. Patil, E. K. Paulson, E. M. Merkle, W. N. Simmons, S. A. Pierre, and G. M. Preminger Renal Stone Assessment with Dual-Energy Multidetector CT and Advanced Postprocessing Techniques: Improved Characterization of Renal Stone Composition--Pilot Study Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 813 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
