| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Hopital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique L. Pradel,
28 rue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.
2
Johns Hopkins University, Outpatient Center, Rm. 4250, 601 N. Caroline St.,
Baltimore, MD 21287-0845.
3
Department of Vascular Surgery, Hopital Edouart Herriot, 5 place d'Arsonval,
69437, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
4
Department of Biostatistics, CMI, Hopital Hotel Dieu, 1 place de l'Hopital,
69288, Lyon Cedex 02, France.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, used alone or in association with duplex Doppler sonography, with a fast acquisition time (8 sec) for evaluating the extracranial carotid arteries.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective study, 48 successive patients with carotid artery stenoses were examined with 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Of the 44 eligible patients, conventional angiography was available in 33 and duplex sonography in 27. We used the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial technique to quantify stenosis on all angiograms, and a 250 cm/sec threshold at duplex sonography to diagnose stenoses greater than 70%. Image quality of 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography was assessed, as well as sensitivity and specificity for each technique alone and in combination with duplex sonography. Conventional angiography was the gold standard.
RESULTS. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography yielded good image quality in 90% of cases. When used alone, it yielded a sensitivity and a specificity of 94% and 85%, respectively, in screening stenoses greater than 70% (70-99%). When combined with duplex Doppler sonography, it provided a 100% sensitivity and specificity for detection of stenoses between 70% and 99% and would have obviated 61% of conventional angiography. In comparison, 3D time-of-flight MR angiography used alone yielded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94%. In combination with duplex Doppler sonography, its use would have obviated conventional angiography in 74% of cases. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography provided accurate results in the diagnosis of occlusions and ulcers and can visualize distant stenoses.
CONCLUSION. Used alone, 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is not accurate enough to replace conventional angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid arteries. In association with duplex Doppler sonography, however, it is accurate and may obviate a significant number of conventional angiographic examinations.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Debrey, H. Yu, J. K. Lynch, K.-O. Lovblad, V. L. Wright, S.-J. D. Janket, and A. E. Baird Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2237 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D Mitra, D Connolly, S Jenkins, P English, D Birchall, C Mandel, K Shrikanth, B Gregson, and A Gholkar Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 201 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Anzalone, F. Scomazzoni, R. Castellano, L. Strada, C. Righi, L. S. Politi, M. A. Kirchin, R. Chiesa, and G. Scotti Carotid Artery Stenosis: Intraindividual Correlations of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography, Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography, Conventional DSA, and Rotational Angiography for Detection and Grading Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 204 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos Noninvasive Carotid Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Nederkoorn, O. E. H. Elgersma, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, L. J. Kappelle, and W. P. T. M. Mali Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography for Diagnosis Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 677 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Borisch, M. Horn, B. Butz, N. Zorger, B. Draganski, T. Hoelscher, U. Bogdahn, and J. Link Preoperative Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Duplex Sonography with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Alvarez-Linera, J. Benito-Leon, J. Escribano, J. Campollo, and R. Gesto Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 1012 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C.C. Johnston, J. D. Eastwood, T. Nguyen, and L. B. Goldstein Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Utility in Routine Clinical Practice Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2834 - 2838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, A. van der Lugt, L. W. Bartels, and W. P.T.M. Mali Time-of-Flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2002; 23(10): 1779 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Nederkoorn, W. P.Th.M. Mali, B. C. Eikelboom, O. E.H. Elgersma, E. Buskens, M.G. M. Hunink, L. J. Kappelle, P. C. Buijs, A. F.J. Wust, A. van der Lugt, et al. Preoperative Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Noninvasive Testing Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2003 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Gillard, B. D. M. Tom, W. Hollingworth, B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, M. Duyme, M. Sahel, A. Zouaoui, and C. Marsault Validation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Newer Techniques * Dr Randoux and colleagues respond: Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 586 - 587. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Remonda, P. Senn, A. Barth, M. Arnold, K.-O. Lovblad, and G. Schroth Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography of the Carotid Artery: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Fellner, J. M. Serfaty, and P. C. Douek Different MR Angiography Techniques Provide Different Results in Assessing Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177 (2): 468 - 469. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
