AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scialpi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rotondo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scialpi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rotondo, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 175:751-757
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Small Renal Masses

Assessment of Lesion Characterization and Vascularity on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging with Fat Suppression

Michele Scialpi1, Arcangelo Di Maggio2, Massimi Midiri3, Angelo Loperfido2, Giuseppe Angelelli3 and Antonio Rotondo3

1 Department of Radiology, SS Annunziata Hospital, via Bruno, 74100 Taranto, Italy.
2 Department of Nephrology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, 74100 Taranto, Italy.
3 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 70124 Bari, Italy.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to characterize renal lesions equal to or smaller than 3.0 cm using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression by means of quantitative analysis of signal intensity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the MR imaging examinations of 35 patients (20 with renal cell carcinoma, eight with angiomyolipoma, and seven with complicated cysts) who were studied with spin-echo and dynamic fat-suppressed gradient-recalled echo MR sequences, before and after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Every 30 sec after contrast injection, we measured the lesion percentage of enhancement and the ratio of contrast (lesion—renal cortex signal intensity difference) to noise.

RESULTS. Ten renal cell carcinomas were classified as hypervascular (enhancement greater than that of renal cortex) and 10 as hypovascular. The percentage of enhancement of hypervascular carcinomas was similar to that of renal cortex until 150 sec and greater in the late sequences (180-210 sec, p < 0.01). Hypovascular carcinomas had a lower percentage of enhancement than hypervascular carcinomas (60-210 sec, p < 0.005). Angiomyolipomas, after an early enhancement peak, showed values similar to those of hypovascular carcinomas. Complicated cysts had very low enhancement (p < 0.001). The baseline contrast-to-noise ratio was negative for all lesions (hypointensity with respect to renal cortex). After gadolinium injection, the contrast-to-noise ratio of hypervascular carcinomas rose, becoming positive after 150 sec. Until 60 sec, the contrast-to-noise ratio of hypovascular carcinomas declined slightly, whereas that of angiomyolipomas and cysts fell sharply; then the three curves remained stable (60-210 sec, p < 0.05 for all matches except angiomyolipomas versus cysts).

CONCLUSION. Quantitative analysis of signal intensity variations during dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression can be useful in the characterization of small renal lesions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Fan, D. Lianfang, X. Jinfang, S. Yijin, and W. Ying
Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Solid Renal Parenchymal Lesions With Maximum Diameters of 5 cm
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 875 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. J. Pijl, J. Doornbos, M. N. J. M. Wasser, H. C. van Houwelingen, R. A. E. M. Tollenaar, and J. L. Bloem
Quantitative Analysis of Focal Masses at MR Imaging: A Plea for Standardization
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 737 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. B. Ho, S. F. Allen, M. N. Hood, and P. L. Choyke
Renal Masses: Quantitative Assessment of Enhancement with Dynamic MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 695 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.