AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Metreweli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Metreweli, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 175:759-766
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Comparison of Dynamic Helical CT and Dynamic MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma

Wei Tse Yang1, Wynnie Wai Man Lam1, Mei Yung Yu2, Tak Hong Cheung3 and Constantine Metreweli1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
2 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE. This study compares dynamic helical CT with dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Women with biopsy-proven cervical carcinoma prospectively underwent dynamic helical CT and MR imaging before surgery. A metastatic node on CT and MR imaging was defined as a rounded soft-tissue structure greater than 10 mm in maximal axial diameter or a node with central necrosis. Imaging results were compared with pathology, and receiver operating characteristic curves for size and shape were plotted on a hemipelvis basis. Nodal density and signal intensity on CT and MR images, respectively, were reviewed for differences between benign and malignant disease.

RESULTS. A total of 949 lymph nodes were found at pathology in 76 hemipelves in 43 women, of which 69 lymph nodes (7%) in 17 hemipelves (22%) were metastatic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of helical CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis on a hemipelvis basis was 64.7%, 96.6%, 84.6%, 90.5%, and 89.5% and 70.6%, 89.8%, 66.7%, 91.4%, and 85.5%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves for helical CT and MR imaging gave cutoff values of 9 and 12 mm in maximal axial diameter, respectively, in the prediction of metastasis. Central necrosis had a positive predictive value of 100% in the diagnosis of metastasis. Signal intensity on MR imaging and density—enhancement pattern on CT in patients with metastatic nodes did not differ from those in patients with negative nodes.

CONCLUSION. Helical CT and MR imaging show similar accuracy in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with cervical carcinoma. Central necrosis is useful in the diagnosis of metastasis in pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
H. H. Chung, S.-B. Kang, J. Y. Cho, J. W. Kim, N.-H. Park, Y.-S. Song, S. H. Kim, and H.-P. Lee
Can Preoperative MRI Accurately Evaluate Nodal and Parametrial Invasion in Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 7, 2007; (2007) hym036v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Sala, S. Wakely, E. Senior, and D. Lomas
MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1577 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. J. Choi, S. H. Kim, S.-S. Seo, S. Kang, S. Lee, J.-Y. Kim, Y. H. Kim, J. S. Lee, H. H. Chung, J.-H. Lee, et al.
MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W538 - W543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Lopez and S Chakravarti
Imaging of cervical cancer
Imaging, August 1, 2006; 18(1): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Kawai, M. Sumi, and T. Nakamura
Turbo Short {tau} Inversion Recovery Imaging for Metastatic Node Screening in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1283 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H.-H. Chou, T.-C. Chang, T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S. Hsueh, S.-Y. Ma, C.-J. Chang, H.-J. Huang, A. Chao, T.-I Wu, et al.
Low Value of [18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Before Radical Hysterectomy
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 123 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sironi, A. Buda, M. Picchio, P. Perego, R. Moreni, A. Pellegrino, M. Colombo, C. Mangioni, C. Messa, and F. Fazio
Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Clinical Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Detection with Integrated FDG PET/CT
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 272 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Mazumdar
Group Sequential Design for Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Implications and Guidelines for Practitioners
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 525 - 533.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M S Thyagarajan, M J Dobson, and A Biswas
Appearance of uterine cervical lymphoma on MRI: a case report and review of the literature
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2004; 77(918): 512 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Manfredi, P. Mirk, G. Maresca, P. A. Margariti, A. Testa, G. F. Zannoni, D. Giordano, G. Scambia, and P. Marano
Local-Regional Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma: Role of MR Imaging in Surgical Planning
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 372 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S.-Y. Ma, H.-H. Chou, C.-S. Tsai, S. Hsueh, T.-C. Chang, J.-H. Hong, L.-C. See, W.-J. Lin, et al.
Value of Dual-Phase 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3651 - 3658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Y. Jeong, H. K. Kang, T. W. Chung, J. J. Seo, and J. G. Park
Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Therapy: CT and MR Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. S. Siegelman
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 981 - 981.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kaur, P. M. Silverman, R. B. Iyer, C. F. Verschraegen, P. J. Eifel, and C. Charnsangavej
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1621 - 1631.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. U. Herborn, T. C. Lauenstein, F. M. Vogt, R. B. Lauffer, J. F. Debatin, and S. G. Ruehm
Interstitial MR Lymphography with MS-325: Characterization of Normal and Tumor-Invaded Lymph Nodes in a Rabbit Model
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1567 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. C. A. Michel, T. M. Keller, J. M. Frohlich, D. Fink, R. Caduff, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch
Preoperative Breast Cancer Staging: MR Imaging of the Axilla with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. K. Pannu, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman
CT Evaluation of Cervical Cancer: Spectrum of Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1155 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. D. Williams, C. Cousins, W. P. Soutter, M. Mubashar, A. M. Peters, R. Dina, F. Fuchsel, G. A. McIndoe, and N. M. deSouza
Detection of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases in Gynecologic Malignancy: A Comparison of CT, MR Imaging, and Positron Emission Tomography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 343 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.