|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Chinese University of
Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
2
Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong
Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese University of Hong Kong,
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
OBJECTIVE. This study compares dynamic helical CT with dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Women with biopsy-proven cervical carcinoma prospectively underwent dynamic helical CT and MR imaging before surgery. A metastatic node on CT and MR imaging was defined as a rounded soft-tissue structure greater than 10 mm in maximal axial diameter or a node with central necrosis. Imaging results were compared with pathology, and receiver operating characteristic curves for size and shape were plotted on a hemipelvis basis. Nodal density and signal intensity on CT and MR images, respectively, were reviewed for differences between benign and malignant disease.
RESULTS. A total of 949 lymph nodes were found at pathology in 76 hemipelves in 43 women, of which 69 lymph nodes (7%) in 17 hemipelves (22%) were metastatic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of helical CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis on a hemipelvis basis was 64.7%, 96.6%, 84.6%, 90.5%, and 89.5% and 70.6%, 89.8%, 66.7%, 91.4%, and 85.5%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves for helical CT and MR imaging gave cutoff values of 9 and 12 mm in maximal axial diameter, respectively, in the prediction of metastasis. Central necrosis had a positive predictive value of 100% in the diagnosis of metastasis. Signal intensity on MR imaging and densityenhancement pattern on CT in patients with metastatic nodes did not differ from those in patients with negative nodes.
CONCLUSION. Helical CT and MR imaging show similar accuracy in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with cervical carcinoma. Central necrosis is useful in the diagnosis of metastasis in pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancer.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Hancke, V. Heilmann, P. Straka, R. Kreienberg, and C. Kurzeder Pretreatment Staging of Cervical Cancer: Is Imaging Better Than Palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in Preoperative Staging of Cervical Cancer: Single Institution Results for 255 Patients Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2008; 15(10): 2856 - 2861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Chung, S.-B. Kang, J. Y. Cho, J. W. Kim, N.-H. Park, Y.-S. Song, S. H. Kim, and H.-P. Lee Can Preoperative MRI Accurately Evaluate Nodal and Parametrial Invasion in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 7, 2007; (2007) hym036v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sala, S. Wakely, E. Senior, and D. Lomas MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1577 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Choi, S. H. Kim, S.-S. Seo, S. Kang, S. Lee, J.-Y. Kim, Y. H. Kim, J. S. Lee, H. H. Chung, J.-H. Lee, et al. MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W538 - W543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Lopez and S Chakravarti Imaging of cervical cancer Imaging, August 1, 2006; 18(1): 10 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawai, M. Sumi, and T. Nakamura Turbo Short {tau} Inversion Recovery Imaging for Metastatic Node Screening in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1283 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Chou, T.-C. Chang, T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S. Hsueh, S.-Y. Ma, C.-J. Chang, H.-J. Huang, A. Chao, T.-I Wu, et al. Low Value of [18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Before Radical Hysterectomy J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 123 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sironi, A. Buda, M. Picchio, P. Perego, R. Moreni, A. Pellegrino, M. Colombo, C. Mangioni, C. Messa, and F. Fazio Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Clinical Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Detection with Integrated FDG PET/CT Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 272 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mazumdar Group Sequential Design for Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Implications and Guidelines for Practitioners Med Decis Making, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 525 - 533. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M S Thyagarajan, M J Dobson, and A Biswas Appearance of uterine cervical lymphoma on MRI: a case report and review of the literature Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2004; 77(918): 512 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Manfredi, P. Mirk, G. Maresca, P. A. Margariti, A. Testa, G. F. Zannoni, D. Giordano, G. Scambia, and P. Marano Local-Regional Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma: Role of MR Imaging in Surgical Planning Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 372 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S.-Y. Ma, H.-H. Chou, C.-S. Tsai, S. Hsueh, T.-C. Chang, J.-H. Hong, L.-C. See, W.-J. Lin, et al. Value of Dual-Phase 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3651 - 3658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Y. Jeong, H. K. Kang, T. W. Chung, J. J. Seo, and J. G. Park Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Therapy: CT and MR Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 969 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Siegelman Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 981 - 981. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kaur, P. M. Silverman, R. B. Iyer, C. F. Verschraegen, P. J. Eifel, and C. Charnsangavej Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1621 - 1631. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. U. Herborn, T. C. Lauenstein, F. M. Vogt, R. B. Lauffer, J. F. Debatin, and S. G. Ruehm Interstitial MR Lymphography with MS-325: Characterization of Normal and Tumor-Invaded Lymph Nodes in a Rabbit Model Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1567 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. A. Michel, T. M. Keller, J. M. Frohlich, D. Fink, R. Caduff, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch Preoperative Breast Cancer Staging: MR Imaging of the Axilla with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Pannu, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman CT Evaluation of Cervical Cancer: Spectrum of Disease RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1155 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Williams, C. Cousins, W. P. Soutter, M. Mubashar, A. M. Peters, R. Dina, F. Fuchsel, G. A. McIndoe, and N. M. deSouza Detection of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases in Gynecologic Malignancy: A Comparison of CT, MR Imaging, and Positron Emission Tomography Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 343 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |