|
|
||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to show that compressed breast thickness on mammograms in overweight and obese women exceeds the thickness in normal-weight women and that increased thickness results in image degradation.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Three hundred consecutive routine mammograms were reviewed. Patients were categorized according to body mass index. Compression thickness, compressive force, kilovoltage, and milliampere-seconds were recorded. Geometric unsharpness and contrast degradation were calculated for each body mass index category.
RESULTS. Body mass index categories were lean (3%), normal (36%), overweight (36%), and obese (25%). Body mass index was directly correlated with compressed thickness. In the mediolateral oblique view, the mean thickness of the obese category exceeded normal thickness by 18 mm (p < 0.01), corresponding to a 32% increase in geometric unsharpness. Mean obese thickness exceeded lean thickness by 33 mm (p < 0.01), corresponding to a 79% increase in unsharpness. Similar trends were observed for the craniocaudal view. In the mediolateral oblique projection, there was an increase of 1.0 kVp (p < 0.01) for obese compared with normal and 1.7 kVp (p < 0.01) between lean and obese, corresponding, respectively, to a 16% and a 25% decrease in image contrast because of scatter and kilovoltage changes. Milliampere-seconds increased by 47% on the mediolateral oblique images in the obese category compared with normal body mass index.
CONCLUSION. An increased body mass index was associated with greater compressed breast thickness, resulting in increased geometric unsharpness, decreased image contrast, and greater potential for motion unsharpness.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M ROBINSON and C J KOTRE Trends in compressed breast thickness and radiation dose in breast screening mammography Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2008; 81(963): 214 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Uppot, D. V. Sahani, P. F. Hahn, D. Gervais, and P. R. Mueller Impact of Obesity on Medical Imaging and Image-Guided Intervention Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 433 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Elmore, P. A. Carney, L. A. Abraham, W. E. Barlow, J. R. Egger, J. S. Fosse, G. R. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D'Orsi, P. Paliwal, et al. The Association Between Obesity and Screening Mammography Accuracy Arch Intern Med, May 24, 2004; 164(10): 1140 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |