| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., HFZ-541, Rockville, MD
20850.
2
Department of Radiology, University of California at San Diego School of
Medicine, 410 W. Dickinson St., San Diego, CA 92103.
3
Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology and Greenebaum Cancer
Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene St.,
Baltimore, MD 21201.
4
Department of Radiology, Duke South Hospital, Duke University Medical Center,
Box 3808, Second Floor, Red Zone, Durham, NC 27710.
OBJECTIVE. Silicone gel breast implants have been reported to rupture, but the prevalence of implant rupture in an unreferred population of women is not known. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of implant rupture and the presence of extracapsular silicone gel in an unreferred population of women without regard to the absence or presence of any local or systemic symptoms.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Women identified as part of a National Cancer Institute cohort study on breast implants, living in the Birmingham, AL, area were invited to undergo MR imaging of their current silicone gel breast implants at the Kirklin Clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Three radiologists independently examined and rated all MR images for signs of implant rupture and extracapsular silicone.
RESULTS. A total of 344 women with silicone gel breast implants underwent MR imaging. Breast implant rupture was reported by at least two of three radiologists for 378 (55.0%) of the 687 implants in this study. Another 50 implants (7.2%) were rated as indeterminate (suspicious) for rupture. A majority of women in this study, 265 (77.0%) of 344, had at least one breast implant that was rated as ruptured or indeterminate. Radiologists also agreed that silicone gel could be seen outside the fibrous capsule that forms around the implant in 85 (12.4%) of the 687 implants affecting 73 women (21.2%). Factors that affected implant rupture were implant age and location (submuscular or subglandular). The median implant age at rupture was estimated to be 10.8 years with a 95% confidence interval of 8.4-13.9 years.
CONCLUSION. The prevalence of silent or occult silicone gel breast implant rupture is higher than was previously suspected. Most women in this study had MR imaging evidence of at least one ruptured silicone gel breast implant.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.-W. Kwek, H. Choi, J. Ma, and M. J. Miller Gel-Gel Double-Lumen Silicone Breast Implant: Mimic of Intracapsular Implant Rupture Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W436 - W437. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Levine, T. C. Allen, J. Cartwright Jr, and P. T. Cagle Silicone Thorax Due to a Ruptured Breast Implant Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1854 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Holmich, S. Friis, J. P. Fryzek, I. M. Vejborg, C. Conrad, S. Sletting, K. Kjoller, J. K. McLaughlin, and J. H. Olsen Incidence of Silicone Breast Implant Rupture Arch Surg, July 1, 2003; 138(7): 801 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Berg, T. K. Nguyen, M. S. Middleton, M. S. Soo, G. Pennello, and S. L. Brown MR Imaging of Extracapsular Silicone from Breast Implants: Diagnostic Pitfalls Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 465 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
