HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lowe, L. H. Articles by Hernanz-Schulman, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lowe, L. H. Articles by Hernanz-Schulman, M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Appendicolith Revealed on CT in Children with Suspected Appendicitis

How Specific Is It in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis?

¹ Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Children's Hospital and Medical Center, D-1120 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.
² School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208.
³ Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of a diagnosis of appendicitis when CT without enteric contrast material reveals an appendicolith in children with suspected appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of children who underwent abdominal CT for suspected appendicitis over a 25-month period was performed to identify patients with an appendicolith. An age-matched group of patients examined for trauma served as controls.

RESULTS. CT was performed in 104 children. Appendicitis was present in 60 (58%) of 104 children; 39 (65%) of 60 had an appendicolith. Appendicitis was not present in 44 (42%) of 104; six (14%) of 44 had an appendicolith. An appendicolith detected on CT had a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 86% for the radiologist diagnosing appendicitis. An appendicolith had a positive predictive value of 74% and a negative predictive value of 26%. Among the control population, two (3%) of 74 children had an appendicolith. This number was statistically significant compared with children in the study group with an appendicolith and abdominal pain, but without appendicitis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION. Although an appendicolith is significantly associated with appendicitis, the detection of an isolated appendicolith on CT is not sufficiently specific to be the sole basis for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Keyzer, S. Pargov, D. Tack, V. Creteur, P. Bohy, V. De Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois Normal Appendix in Adults: Reproducibility of Detection with Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 507 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Rucker, C. O. Menias, and S. Bhalla Mimics of Renal Colic: Alternative Diagnoses at Unenhanced Helical CT RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S11 - S28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Siewert, V. Raptopoulos, S.-I. Liu, R. A. Hodin, R. B. Davis, and M. P. Rosen CT Predictors of Failed Laparoscopic Appendectomy Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Alobaidi and A. Shirkhoda Value of Bone Window Settings on CT for Revealing Appendicoliths in Patients with Appendicitis Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 201 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Callahan, D. P. Rodriguez, and G. A. Taylor CT of Appendicitis in Children Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]