HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kauczor, H.-U. Articles by Thelen, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kauczor, H.-U. Articles by Thelen, M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Automatic Detection and Quantification of Ground-Glass Opacities on High-Resolution CT Using Multiple Neural Networks

Comparison with a Density Mask

¹ Department of Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
² Institute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Staudinger Weg 9, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
³ Institut für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. We compared multiple neural networks with a density mask for the automatic detection and quantification of ground-glass opacities on high-resolution CT under clinical conditions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eighty-four patients (54 men and 30 women; age range, 18-82 years; mean age, 49 years) with a total of 99 consecutive high-resolution CT scans were enrolled in the study. The neural network was designed to detect ground-glass opacities with high sensitivity and to omit air—tissue interfaces to increase specificity. The results of the neural network were compared with those of a density mask (thresholds, -750/-300 H), with a radiologist serving as the gold standard.

RESULTS. The neural network classified 6% of the total lung area as ground-glass opacities. The density mask failed to detect 1.3%, and this percentage represented the increase in sensitivity that was achieved by the neural network. The density mask identified another 17.3% of the total lung area to be ground-glass opacities that were not detected by the neural network. This area represented the increase in specificity achieved by the neural network. Related to the extent of the ground-glass opacities as classified by the radiologist, the neural network (density mask) reached a sensitivity of 99% (89%), specificity of 83% (55%), positive predictive value of 78% (18%), negative predictive value of 99% (98%), and accuracy of 89% (58%).

CONCLUSION. Automatic segmentation and quantification of ground-glass opacities on high-resolution CT by a neural network are sufficiently accurate to be implemented for the preinterpretation of images in a clinical environment; it is superior to a double-threshold density mask.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. G. Kim, J. M. Goo, J. H. Kim, H. J. Lee, B. G. Min, K. T. Bae, and J.-G. Im Computer-aided Diagnosis of Localized Ground-Glass Opacity in the Lung at CT: Initial Experience Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 657 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Aisen, L. S. Broderick, H. Winer-Muram, C. E. Brodley, A. C. Kak, C. Pavlopoulou, J. Dy, C.-R. Shyu, and A. Marchiori Automated Storage and Retrieval of Thin-Section CT Images to Assist Diagnosis: System Description and Preliminary Assessment Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 265 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]