HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baldisserotto, M. Articles by Marchiori, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baldisserotto, M. Articles by Marchiori, E. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Accuracy of Noncompressive Sonography of Children with Appendicitis According to the Potential Positions of the Appendix

¹ Departmento de Radiologia, Hospital Criança Conceição, Ministério da Saúde, Av. Francisco Trein, 596, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 91350-200.
² Departmento de Radiologia do Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Thomaz Cameron, 438, 25685-120 Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE. This study evaluates noncompressive sonography of appendicitis in children according to the potential positions of the appendix.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We evaluated 425 consecutive boys and girls clinically suspected of having appendicitis. Noncompressive sonography used a 5.0-MHz curved-array transducer to assess deep layers. We systematically investigated the possible positions of the appendix by evaluating the right retrocecal region through the flank, the pelvis through the suprapubic region with the urinary bladder full, and the right lower quadrant. Whenever the appendix was not visualized, graded compression examination was performed with 5.0-MHz curved-array and 7.5-MHz linear transducers, and the remainder of the abdomen was thoroughly examined with 5.0- and 3.75-MHz curved-array transducers. Sonographic findings were correlated with pathology findings after surgery in 212 cases and with clinical follow-up in 213.

RESULTS. Of the 425 patients with abdominal pain, 199 had surgically confirmed appendicitis; noncompressive examination accurately identified 135 (31.7%) of these 425 cases, and the combined noncompressive and compressive examinations diagnosed 196 cases. The combined noncompressive and compressive techniques had a sensitivity of 98.5% (95% confidence interval, 96.8-100), specificity of 98.2% (96.5-99.9), positive and negative predictive values of 98.0% (99.9) and 98.7% (97.2-100), respectively.

CONCLUSION. The noncompressive technique is a valuable tool in sonographic investigation of appendicitis.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Baldisserotto, S. G. Valduga, and C. F. J. S. da Cunha MR Imaging Evaluation of the Normal Appendix in Children and Adolescents Radiology, August 18, 2008; (2008) 2491071703. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Yabunaka, T. Katsuda, S. Sanada, and T. Fukutomi Sonographic Appearance of the Normal Appendix in Adults J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Scott, H. Swan, E. Jurriaans, and M. Voss Sonographic Detection of the Normal Appendix: Does the Combination of Real-Time Spatial Compounding and Tissue Harmonic Imaging Make a Difference? Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 2004; 20(5): 326 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. Taylor Suspected Appendicitis in Children: In Search of the Single Best Diagnostic Test Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 293 - 295. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Puig, M. Hormann, W. Rebhandl, R. Felder-Puig, M. Prokop, and K. Paya US as a Primary Diagnostic Tool in Relation to Negative Appendectomy: Six Years Experience Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 101 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]