HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keberle, M. Articles by Hahn, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keberle, M. Articles by Hahn, D. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Detection of Pharyngeal Perforation

Comparison of Aqueous and Barium-Containing Contrast Agents

¹ Department of Radiology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany.
² Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Würzburg, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. We sought to assess the value of aqueous and barium-containing contrast agents in the detection of pharyngeal perforation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Visual and objective in vitro comparisons of an iodinated aqueous contrast agent, a 50% weight/volume barium suspension, and a 100% weight/volume barium suspension were performed. Moreover, to exclude pharyngeal perforation after surgery, we prospectively examined 109 patients by pharyngography, using the aqueous contrast agent and the 100% weight/volume barium suspension. All patients with a pharyngeal perforation were followed up clinically to exclude complications due to barium application.

RESULTS. As opposed to the 100% weight/volume barium suspension, in vitro comparison between the aqueous contrast agent and the 50% weight/volume barium suspension yielded no substantial differences. Seventeen perforations could be detected with the aqueous contrast agent. Although 10 of 17 perforations could be slightly better visualized with the 100% weight/volume barium suspension, two perforations were missed with this agent. Five perforations were equally well detected with both.

CONCLUSION. Because of a higher radiopacity, 100% weight/volume barium suspensions may more sharply delineate perforations. However, in contrast to aqueous contrast media, narrow pharyngeal perforations can be missed. Thus, the use of a 100% weight/volume barium suspension does not improve the detection of pharyngeal perforation.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. O. Swanson, M. S. Levine, R. O. Redfern, and S. E. Rubesin Usefulness of High-Density Barium for Detection of Leaks After Esophagogastrectomy, Total Gastrectomy, and Total Laryngectomy Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]