HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boland, G. W. L. Articles by Mueller, P. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boland, G. W. L. Articles by Mueller, P. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Dose Reduction in Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Fluoroscopy

Use of Grid-Controlled Pulsed Fluoroscopy

¹ All authors: Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.

OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a grid-controlled fluoroscopy unit compared with a conventional continuous fluoroscopy unit for a variety of abdominal and pelvic fluoroscopic examinations.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Seventy patients (29 men and 41 women; age range, 24-78 years) were enrolled in one of seven abdominal and pelvic fluoroscopic examinations, including upper gastrointestinal series (n = 20), barium enema (n = 10), voiding cystourethrogram (n = 10), percutaneous abdominal catheter tube injection (n = 10), hysterosalpingogram (n = 10), and percutaneous needle insertion and catheter placement (nephrostomy, percutaneous biliary drainage) (n = 10). Each patient underwent at least 10 sec of continuous fluoroscopy that was randomly and blindly compared with 10-sec periods of pulsed fluoroscopy at 15, 7.5, and 3.75 frames per second. A radiologist outside the examination room, unaware of the frame rate per second, evaluated the procedure in real time on a television monitor. The radiologist assessed image quality and diagnostic acceptability using a scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired Student's t test.

RESULTS. For all procedures at all frame rates, we found no statistically significant superiority of one frame rate over another. For most procedures, the slower frame rates were considered equivalent to continuous fluoroscopy when the images were assessed for image quality and diagnostic confidence.

CONCLUSION. Our findings suggest that most abdominal and pelvic fluoroscopic procedures can be performed at substantially lower frame rates than those used for continuous fluoroscopy; adopting this procedure may lead to substantial dose savings for the patient and the fluoroscopy operator.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hernanz-Schulman Science to Practice: Can Fluoroscopic Radiation Dose Be Substantially Reduced? Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 1 - 2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. L. Ward, C. E. Barnewolt, K. J. Strauss, R. L. Lebowitz, V. Venkatakrishnan, M. Stehr, D. L. McLellan, C. A. Peters, D. Zurakowski, P. S. Dunning, et al. Radiation Exposure Reduction during Voiding Cystourethrography in a Pediatric Porcine Model of Vesicoureteral Reflux Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 96 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Vehmas Do radiologists' radiation-related opinions predict their fluoroscopy doses? Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 653 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]