| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
EBT Research Foundation, 64 Valleybrook Dr., Hendersonville, TN 37075.
2
Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, 8900 N. Kendall Dr., Miami, FL
33176.
3
Cardiology Section, SL 48, Tulane University School of Medicine, 14 Tulane
Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity of two electron beam tomography protocols for detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We selected 101 patients (57% men, mean age 53 ± 10 years) to undergo two consecutive electron beam tomography and acquired imaging with both a 6-mm and a 3-mm slicing protocol. Three pixels (area, 1.03 mm2) and a minimal density of 130 H were used for definition of calcified plaque.
RESULTS. We found coronary artery calcifications in 46 patients when we used a 6-mm protocol and in 61 patients when we used a 3-mm protocol (p < 0.001). The average total calcium score was 77 (±140) with a 6-mm protocol and 251 (±395) with a 3-mm protocol (p < 0.005). The average number of calcified lesions per patient was 1.7 for a 6-mm protocol and 3.7 for a 3-mm protocol (p < 0.01). Of 179 individual lesions seen using a 3-mm protocol, 103 (58%) were missed using a 6-mm protocol, and only 27% of the lesions with a calcium score less than or equal to 40 seen with a 3-mm protocol were detected with 6-mm slicing (p < 0.001). The mean lesion attenuation with a 6-mm protocol was 160 (±42) H, compared with 218 (±44) H with a 3-mm protocol (p < 0.001), indicating a significantly greater partial volume averaging with the former protocol.
CONCLUSION. A 6-mm slicing protocol is significantly less sensitive than a 3-mm protocol for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium. Since one third of coronary events occur in patients with low calcium scores, a 6-mm protocol might be unreliable for risk assessment because of substantial loss of information in this calcium score range.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Rutten, I. Isgum, and M. Prokop Coronary Calcification: Effect of Small Variation of Scan Starting Position on Agatston, Volume, and Mass Scores Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 90 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Horiguchi, H. Yamamoto, N. Hirai, Y. Akiyama, C. Fujioka, K. Marukawa, H. Fukuda, and K. Ito Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements on low-dose ECG-gated 16-MDCT. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W1 - W6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. V. Anand, E. Lim, D. Hopkins, R. Corder, L. J. Shaw, P. Sharp, D. Lipkin, and A. Lahiri Risk stratification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes: prospective evaluation of the combined use of coronary artery calcium imaging and selective myocardial perfusion scintigraphy Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2006; 27(6): 713 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Horiguchi, Y. Shen, Y. Akiyama, N. Hirai, K. Sasaki, M. Ishifuro, T. Nakanishi, and K. Ito Electron Beam CT Versus 16-MDCT on the Variability of Repeated Coronary Artery Calcium Measurements in a Variable Heart Rate Phantom Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 995 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Higgins, S. A. Marvel, and J. D. Morrisett Quantification of Calcification in Atherosclerotic Lesions Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2005; 25(8): 1567 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Horiguchi, H. Yamamoto, Y. Akiyama, N. Hirai, K. Marukawa, H. Fukuda, and K. Ito Variability of Repeated Coronary Artery Calcium Measurements by 16-MDCT with Retrospective Reconstruction Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1917 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hong, T. K. Pilgram, F. Zhu, and K. T. Bae Coronary Artery Calcification: Effect of Size of Field of View on Multi-Detector Row CT Measurements Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Raggi, L. J. Shaw, D. S. Berman, and T. Q. Callister Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1663 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Budoff, J. Ehrlich, H. S. Hecht, and J. A. Rumberger Use of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart Disease JAMA, April 21, 2004; 291(15): 1832 - 1832. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Vliegenthart, B. Song, A. Hofman, J. C. M. Witteman, and M. Oudkerk Coronary Calcification at Electron-Beam CT: Effect of Section Thickness on Calcium Scoring in Vitro and in Vivo Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 520 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Qu, T. T. Le, S. P. Azen, M. Xiang, N. D. Wong, T. M. Doherty, and R. C. Detrano Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning by Computed Tomography for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease in Diabetic Subjects Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 905 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Lu, N. Zhuang, S.-S. Mao, J. Child, S. Carson, H. Bakhsheshi, and M. J. Budoff EKG-triggered CT Data Acquisition to Reduce Variability in Coronary Arterial Calcium Score Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 838 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hong, C. R. Becker, U. J. Schoepf, B. Ohnesorge, R. Bruening, and M. F. Reiser Coronary Artery Calcium: Absolute Quantification in Nonenhanced and Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Studies Radiology, May 1, 2002; (2002) 2232010919. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hong, C. R. Becker, U. J. Schoepf, B. Ohnesorge, R. Bruening, and M. F. Reiser Coronary Artery Calcium: Absolute Quantification in Nonenhanced and Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Studies Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 474 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
