AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bret, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bret, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 176:123-127
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Expectant Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancies

Clinical and Sonographic Predictors

Mostafa Atri1,2, Chi-Ming Chow3, George Kintzen1, Peter Gillett4, Ann A. Aldis1, Micheline Thibodeau1, Caroline Reinhold1 and Patrice M. Bret1,5

1 Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Ave. Cedar, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada.
2 Present address: Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, Ontario M3N 3M5, Canada.
3 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave. W., Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A2, Canada.
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada.
5 Present address: Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, 610 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. We identified the potential clinical and sonographic predictors of the spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancies.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed a prospective study of 78 consecutive patients with a transvaginal sonographic diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy who had either two consecutive quantitative measurements of their beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) more than 24 hrs apart or an embryo with a heart beat. We evaluated the patient's age, time from the last menstrual period, ß-hCG level, size of ectopic pregnancy, presence of a gestational sac or embryonic elements, vascularity on color Doppler sonography, peak systolic velocity, and resistive index of ectopic pregnancy at the time of presentation as potential independent predictors of the final outcome. Logistic regression was performed to identify the independent predictors.

RESULTS. Forty-six patients had declining ß-hCG levels, and 32 ectopic pregnancies showed an embryo with a heart beat or had steady or rising ß-hCG levels. Univariate analysis indicated that a longer time from the last menstrual period (older ectopic pregnancies), lower ß-hCG levels, and the absence of gestational sac are statistically more significantly seen in ectopic pregnancies with declining ß-hCG levels (p < 0.05). Resistive index of ectopic pregnancy reached borderline significance (p = 0.05). In a multiple logistic model, the same variables were independent predictors of outcome (p < 0.05). Resistive index was also a predictor (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION. Longer times from the last menstrual period, lower ß-hCG levels, absence of gestational sacs, and higher resistive indexes of ectopic pregnancy at the time of presentation appear to be independent predictors of the spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Bottomley, V. Van Belle, F. Mukri, E. Kirk, S. Van Huffel, D. Timmerman, and T. Bourne
The optimal timing of an ultrasound scan to assess the location and viability of an early pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., April 10, 2009; (2009) dep084v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H. Fernandez and A. Gervaise
Ectopic pregnancies after infertility treatment: modern diagnosis and therapeutic strategy
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2004; 10(6): 503 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Atri
Ectopic Pregnancy Versus Corpus Luteum Cyst Revisited: Best Doppler Predictors
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2003; 22(11): 1181 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.