AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 176:653-659
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Tissue Harmonic Imaging

Is It a Benefit for Bile Duct Sonography?

Dulia Ortega1,2, Peter N. Burns3, David Hope Simpson3 and Stephanie R. Wilson1

1 Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4 Canada.
2 Present address: Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Servicio de Radiologia, Santos Dumont 999, 4t. piso sector C, Santiago, Chile.
3 Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Imaging Research, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4 Canada.

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to compare tissue harmonic imaging with conventional sonography of the biliary tract.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eighty patients with suspect biliary disease had conventional sonography and tissue harmonic imaging with an ATL 3000 or 5000 scanner in a 6-month interval. Final diagnoses included malignant biliary obstruction (n = 30), choledocholithiasis (n = 16), sclerosing cholangitis (n = 4), normal or nonobstructed ducts (n = 16), and miscellaneous conditions (n = 14). Similar images were taken with each technique in terms of projection, field of view, focal zone selection, and evidence of disease. Two separate observers blinded to patient data and technique reviewed and graded images individually for the appearance of the lumen of the bile ducts, the length of the visible duct, the appearance of the duct wall, the presence of any intraluminal masses, and the appearance of associated acoustic shadows. Images were graded from zero to 3, with 3 being the best.

RESULTS. The median of the 546 tissue harmonic images was one grade higher than the median for the corresponding conventional images (p < 0.0001). Improvements with tissue harmonic imaging included better sharpness of the duct walls (p < 0.01), a clearer lumen (p < 0.0001), identification of a longer length of the common bile duct (p < 0.0001), and improved detection of intraluminal masses (p < 0.006). Acoustic shadows were better defined and blacker with tissue harmonic imaging (p < 0.007).

CONCLUSION. Improvement in contrast and reduction of side lobe artifacts with tissue harmonic imaging enhance visualization of the biliary ducts. Tissue harmonic imaging is now our routine technique for bile duct examination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S.-Y. Chiou, F. Forsberg, T. B. Fox, and L. Needleman
Comparing Differential Tissue Harmonic Imaging With Tissue Harmonic and Fundamental Gray Scale Imaging of the Liver
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1557 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. K. Han, H. Brandl, and B. I. Choi
Volumetric Contrast Imaging in Bile Duct Sonography: Technology and Early Clinical Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1602 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
R Razzaq, MBchB, MRCP, FRCR and S A Sukumar
Imaging of the jaundiced adult
Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 287 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Strobel, M. Zanetti, L. Nagy, and J. Hodler
Suspected Rotator Cuff Lesions: Tissue Harmonic Imaging versus Conventional US of the Shoulder
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. O. Oktar, C. Yucel, H. Ozdemir, A. Uluturk, and S. Isik
Comparison of Conventional Sonography, Real-Time Compound Sonography, Tissue Harmonic Sonography, and Tissue Harmonic Compound Sonography of Abdominal and Pelvic Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1341 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Schmidt, C. Hohl, P. Haage, M. Blaum, D. Honnef, C. Weiss, G. Staatz, and R. W. Gunther
Diagnostic Accuracy of Phase-Inversion Tissue Harmonic Imaging Versus Fundamental B-Mode Sonography in the Evaluation of Focal Lesions of the Kidney
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1639 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. T. Szopinski, A. M. Pajk, M. Wysocki, D. Amy, M. Szopinska, and W. Jakubowski
Tissue Harmonic Imaging: Utility in Breast Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2003; 22(5): 479 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. T. Szopinski, M. Wysocki, A. M. Pajk, R. Z. Slapa, W. Jakubowski, and M. Szopinska
Tissue Harmonic Imaging of Thyroid Nodules: Initial Experience
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2003; 22(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.