| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc,
Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 Ave.
Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
2
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc,
Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200
Brussels, Belgium.
OBJECTIVE. This study aimed to determine the value of four MR imaging criteria for evaluating unstable meniscal lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Criteria for unstable meniscal lesions were the presence of a displaced meniscal fragment, visibility on more than three 3-mm-thick coronal and two 4-mm-thick sagittal images, having more than one orientation plane or more than one pattern (contour irregularity, peripheral separation, tear), and having intrameniscal high signal intensity on T2-weighted spin-echo images. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for recognition of instability among all meniscal lesions were determined for the presence of each individual criterion and for the presence of at least one criterion in 50 consecutive patients (mean age, 46 years) who underwent MR imaging and subsequent arthroscopy.
RESULTS. Sensitivities and specificities of these four criteria ranged between 18% and 54% and between 94% and 100%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values ranged between 92% and 100% and between 39% and 52%, respectively. The presence of at least one criterion enabled recognition of unstable lesions with a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and with positive and negative predictive values of 90% and 70%, respectively.
CONCLUSION. The four MR imaging criteria have high specificities and positive predictive values and low sensitivities and negative predictive values when evaluating unstable meniscal lesions.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Englund, A. Guermazi, D. Gale, D. J. Hunter, P. Aliabadi, M. Clancy, and D. T. Felson Incidental Meniscal Findings on Knee MRI in Middle-Aged and Elderly Persons N. Engl. J. Med., September 11, 2008; 359(11): 1108 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Boxheimer, A. M. Lutz, M. Zanetti, K. Treiber, L. Labler, B. Marincek, and D. Weishaupt Characteristics of Displaceable and Nondisplaceable Meniscal Tears at Kinematic MR Imaging of the Knee Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 221 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Vande Berg, J. Malghem, P. Poilvache, B. Maldague, and F. E. Lecouvet Meniscal Tears with Fragments Displaced in Notch and Recesses of Knee: MR Imaging with Arthroscopic Comparison Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 842 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Zanetti, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, J. Romero, B. Seifert, and J. Hodler Patients with Suspected Meniscal Tears: Prevalence of Abnormalities Seen on MRI of 100 Symptomatic and 100 Contralateral Asymptomatic Knees Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
