AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georgiades, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georgiades, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 176:965-968
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Differences of Renal Parenchymal Attenuation for Acutely Obstructed and Unobstructed Kidneys on Unenhanced Helical CT

A Useful Secondary Sign?

Christos S. Georgiades1, Carolyn J. Moore2 and David P. Smith3

1 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287, and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
2 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
3 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21224.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether the difference in attenuation frequently noted on unenhanced helical CT scans between a patient's acutely obstructed kidney and the unobstructed kidney is a reliable secondary sign of acute renal obstruction.

CONCLUSION. In 95% of patients with acute renal obstruction, the affected kidney was less dense than the unobstructed kidney. When visually detected by radiologists using CT, this difference in density was at least two standard deviations above normal, making it a reliable secondary sign for acute obstruction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Goldman, S. Faintuch, S. A. Ajzen, D. M. J. Christofalo, M. P. Araujo, V. Ortiz, M. Srougi, P. J. Kenney, and J. Szejnfeld
Diagnostic Value of Attenuation Measurements of the Kidney on Unenhanced Helical CT of Obstructive Ureterolithiasis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1251 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.