AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorenz, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leef, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorenz, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leef, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 176:991-994
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Radiologic Placement of Implantable Chest Ports in Pediatric Patients

Jonathan M. Lorenz1, Brian Funaki, Thuong Van Ha and Jeffrey A. Leef

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.

OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the technical success and complications associated with radiologic placement of implantable chest ports in children for long-term central venous access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between May 1, 1996 and January 11, 2000, 29 chest ports were placed in 28 children (15 girls, 13 boys; age range, 2-17 years; mean, 11.7 years). The patient's right internal jugular vein was used for access in 93% (27/29) of the procedures, and a collateral neck vein was used as a conduit to recanalize the central veins in two procedures because of bilateral jugular and subclavian vein occlusion. All procedures were performed in interventional radiology suites. Both real-time sonography and fluoroscopy were used to guide venipuncture and port insertion. Follow-up data were obtained through the clinical examination and electronic review of charts.

RESULTS. Technical success was 100%. Fourteen percent of the catheters were removed prematurely, including one catheter removed 17 days after placement because the patient's blood cultures were positive for Candida albicans. No patients experienced hematoma, symptomatic air embolism, symptomatic central venous thrombosis, catheter malposition, or pneumothorax. The median number of days for catheter use by patients was 280 days (total, 9043 days; range, 17-869 days). The rate of confirmed catheter-related infection was 14% or 0.04 per 100 venous access days. One catheter occluded after 132 days.

CONCLUSION. In pediatric patients, radiologists can insert implantable chest ports using real-time sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance with high rates of technical success and low rates of complication.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Verso and G. Agnelli
Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Long-Term Use of Central Venous Catheters in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3665 - 3675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.