AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zagoria, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M. Y. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zagoria, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M. Y. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 176:1117-1122
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi

A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi

Ronald J. Zagoria1, Elaine G. Khatod and Michael Y. M. Chen

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1088.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine if the radiographic visibility of urinary tract calculi could be predicted on the basis of CT features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The images of 26 patients whose urinary tract calculi were revealed on unenhanced helical CT and who also underwent digital abdominal radiography were retrospectively reviewed. CT features studied included size and CT attenuation of the calculi. These CT findings were correlated with the ability to detect the same calculi with radiography.

RESULTS. Forty-nine urinary tract calculi were detected with unenhanced helical CT in 26 patients. Twenty-six (53%) calculi were visible on radiography. Most (79%) calculi larger than 5 mm were detectable with radiography (p < 0.01). One (8%) of 13 calculi with CT attenuation below 200 H was detectable on radiographs. Ninety-five percent (21/22) of calculi with CT attenuation exceeding 300 H were visible on radiographs (p < 0.0001). The one remaining calculus was obscured by overlying anatomy.

CONCLUSION. Radiographic surveillance of urinary tract calculi detected with CT may not be useful if the calculi have a CT attenuation below 200 H. Most calculi larger than 5 mm and nearly all calculi with a CT attenuation exceeding 300 H can be seen on abdominal radiographs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Zagoria
Retrospective view of "diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT".
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 603 - 604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Rogers
Dot Size, Lead Time, and Other Such Clever Cognomen: The Use of Catch Phrases
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1103 - 1103.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.