AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 176:1449-1454
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Value of Positron Emission Tomography with FDG for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Yuji Nakamoto1, Tsuneo Saga1, Takayoshi Ishimori1, Marcelo Mamede1, Kaori Togashi1, Toshihiro Higuchi2, Masaki Mandai2, Shingo Fujii2, Harumi Sakahara3 and Junji Konishi1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-kawahara-cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507 Japan.
2 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507 Japan.
3 Department of Radiology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600 Handa, Hamamatsu, 431-3192 Japan.

OBJECTIVE. Recurrence is often a major problem for patients who have undergone surgery for ovarian cancer. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical contribution of positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for recurrent ovarian cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four women who had undergone surgery or chemoradiotherapy for histopathologically proven ovarian cancer were enrolled in this study. Ovarian cancer was thought to have recurred in 12 of these women because of evidence on conventional imaging modalities or tumor marker measurements (group A). Clinical findings for the remaining 12 women showed them to be disease-free (group B). PET findings for the women were compared with the final diagnoses obtained by histopathology or by clinical follow-up. The clinical contribution of PET was assessed by evaluating whether PET yielded information complementing the findings of conventional modalities and by examining its impact on treatment.

RESULTS. PET gave valuable information for seven of 12 patients in group A in addition to the information obtained from findings on conventional imaging, and treatment was affected in five patients. On the other hand, in group B, additional information was obtained in only three of 12 patients, and treatment of only one patient was affected. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional imaging modalities were 72.7%, 75.0%, and 73.3%, respectively, and these rates improved to 92.3%, 100.0%, and 94.4%, respectively, by considering both conventional imaging modalities and PET findings.

CONCLUSION. Our preliminary data suggest that whole-body PET with FDG can be a complementary modality for following up patients who have had ovarian cancer, especially patients believed to be at risk for recurrence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sironi, C. Messa, G. Mangili, B. Zangheri, G. Aletti, E. Garavaglia, R. Vigano, M. Picchio, G. Taccagni, A. D. Maschio, et al.
Integrated FDG PET/CT in Patients with Persistent Ovarian Cancer: Correlation with Histologic Findings
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 433 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yoshida, T. Kurokawa, K. Kawahara, T. Tsuchida, H. Okazawa, Y. Fujibayashi, Y. Yonekura, and F. Kotsuji
Incremental Benefits of FDG Positron Emission Tomography over CT Alone for the Preoperative Staging of Ovarian Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 227 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. K. Pannu, R. E. Bristow, C. Cohade, E. K. Fishman, and R. L. Wahl
PET-CT in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Initial Observations
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 209 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. J. Woodward, K. Hosseinzadeh, and J. S. Saenger
From the Archives of the AFIP: Radiologic Staging of Ovarian Carcinoma with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 225 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. K. Pannu, R. E. Bristow, F. J. Montz, and E. K. Fishman
Multidetector CT of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Ovarian Cancer
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 687 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S.-M. Cho, H. K. Ha, J. Y. Byun, J. M. Lee, C. J. Kim, S. E. Nam-Koong, and J. M. Lee
Usefulness of FDG PET for Assessment of Early Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 391 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. R. Laking, P. M. Price, Y. Nakamoto, and T. Saga
Clinical Value of Positron Emission Tomography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1030 - 1030.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.