|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth
University, 401 N. 12th St., Rm. 3-407B, P. O. Box 980615, Richmond, VA
23298-0615.
2
Present address: Department of Radiology, St. Mary's Hospital, 5875 Bremo Rd.,
South Bldg., G-6, Richmond, VA 23229.
3
Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health
Sciences Center, Lee St., Rm. 1075, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
4
Present address: Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical
Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rm. 2-6114A, Rochester, NY 14642.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to report our experience in preoperative evaluation of right hepatic lobe donors with a comprehensive MR examination and to compare abdominal MR images, MR cholangiograms, and MR angiograms with findings at surgery, intraoperative cholangiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-eight right hepatic lobe donors underwent preoperative evaluation with MR imaging, MR cholangiography, and MR angiography. Two abdominal radiologists independently and randomly reviewed these studies. Points of assessment included focal and diffuse liver disease, calculation of right lobe volumes, depiction of the biliary tract and ductal anomalies, and depiction of the liver vasculature and vascular anomalies. Comparison was made with intraoperative cholangiograms (n = 20) and digital subtraction angiograms (n = 28).
RESULTS. MR imaging revealed and characterized focal liver lesions in eight of 28 patients. Calculated right lobe volumes agreed with surgically determined volumes within 7% for reviewer 1 and within 15% for reviewer 2. Intrahepatic bile ducts were depicted completely with MR cholangiography in 25 of 28 patients and with intraoperative cholangiography in nine of 20 patients. MR cholangiography revealed ductal anomalies in six patients. MR imaging and MR angiography depicted the portal veins more completely than digital subtraction angiography. MR imaging and MR angiography correctly excluded portal venous anomalies in all patients and revealed surgically confirmed accessory hepatic veins in six of 28 patients. Angiographically confirmed arterial anomalies were correctly detected in three of 28 patients by at least one reviewer on MR imaging and MR angiography.
CONCLUSION. MR imaging, MR cholangiography, and MR angiography provide a comprehensive, accurate means of evaluating donors for factors that may preclude or complicate right hepatic lobe donation.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Lim, M.-J. Kim, S. Myoung, M.-S. Park, J.-Y. Choi, J.-S. Choi, and S. I. Kim MR Cholangiography for Evaluation of Hilar Branching Anatomy in Transplantation of the Right Hepatic Lobe from a Living Donor Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 537 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. An, J. M. Lee, K.-S. Suh, N. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1223 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schroeder, A. Radtke, H. Kuehl, J. F. Debatin, M. Malago, and S. G. Ruehm Evaluation of Living Liver Donors with an All-inclusive 3D Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 900 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Lim, M.-J. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. I. Kim, J.-S. Choi, M.-S. Park, Y. T. Oh, H. S. Yoo, J. T. Lee, and K. W. Kim Preoperative MRI of Potential Living-Donor-Related Liver Transplantation Using a Single Dose of Gadobenate Dimeglumine Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 424 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. J. Wang, B. M. Yeh, J. P. Roberts, R. S. Breiman, A. Qayyum, and F. V. Coakley Living Donor Candidates for Right Hepatic Lobe Transplantation: Evaluation at CT Cholangiography--Initial Experience Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 899 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hermoye, I. Laamari-Azjal, Z. Cao, L. Annet, J. Lerut, B. M. Dawant, and B. E. Van Beers Liver Segmentation in Living Liver Transplant Donors: Comparison of Semiautomatic and Manual Methods Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sahani, R. D'souza, R. Kadavigere, M. Hertl, J. McGowan, S. Saini, and P. R. Mueller Evaluation of Living Liver Transplant Donors: Method for Precise Anatomic Definition by Using a Dedicated Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Protocol RadioGraphics, July 1, 2004; 24(4): 957 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Yeh, R. S. Breiman, B. Taouli, A. Qayyum, J. P. Roberts, and F. V. Coakley Biliary Tract Depiction in Living Potential Liver Donors: Comparison of Conventional MR, Mangafodipir Trisodium-enhanced Excretory MR, and Multi-Detector Row CT Cholangiography--Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 645 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Guiney, J. B. Kruskal, J. Sosna, D. W. Hanto, S. N. Goldberg, and V. Raptopoulos Multi-Detector Row CT of Relevant Vascular Anatomy of the Surgical Plane in Split-Liver Transplantation Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Kapoor, M. S. Peterson, R. L. Baron, S. Patel, B. Eghtesad, and J. J. Fung Intrahepatic Biliary Anatomy of Living Adult Liver Donors: Correlation of Mangafodipir Trisodium--Enhanced MR Cholangiography and Intraoperative Cholangiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1281 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Tibballs Interventional radiology in liver transplantation Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 329 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |