HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jhaveri, K. S. Articles by Thrall, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jhaveri, K. S. Articles by Thrall, J. H. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Effect of Multislice CT Technology on Scanner Productivity

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 32 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.

OBJECTIVE. In this study we analyzed the impact of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity in a tertiary care medical center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We compared the productivity of two diagnostic CT scanners during the periods January 1 to August 31, 1999 (when both scanners had single-slice CT capability) and January 1 to August 31, 2000 (when one of these scanners was replaced with a multislice CT scanner). The scanners were used primarily for outpatients during the day shift and for inpatients during the evening shift; the demand for CT services was stable. For this analysis, we queried the hospital's radiology information system and identified the number of CT examinations performed during the two analysis periods. We also determined the examination mix, including proportion of enhanced and unenhanced examinations and the anatomic region examined, to ensure comparable patient populations. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS. The number of CT studies performed on the two scanners increased by 1772 (13.1%) from 13,548 (before multislice CT) to 15,320 (when multislice CT was available). The number of examinations enhanced with contrast media increased from 52% to 65%. Between 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., the number of CT examinations was similar on the single-slice scanners in the two periods (p > 0.05). However, in the period when multislice CT was available, the number of studies performed on the multislice scanner (5919) was 51.9% higher than those performed using the single-slice scanner (3896) (p < 0.0006).

CONCLUSION. Using a multislice CT scanner leads to an increase in CT productivity, even though multislice studies are performed using more complicated protocols than are used on a single-slice CT scanner.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Blake, M. K. Kalra, A. T. Sweeney, B. C. Lucey, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, E. F. Halpern, P. R. Mueller, P. F. Hahn, and G. W. Boland Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Adrenal Masses: Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol with 10-Minute Delay Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2382041514. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. W. Kwan, B. L. Partik, S. E. Zinck, F. P. Chan, S. T. Kee, A. N. Leung, M. Voracek, and G. D. Rubin Primary Interpretation of Thoracic MDCT Images Using Coronal Reformations Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1500 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J G Cahir, A H Freeman, and H M Courtney Multislice CT of the abdomen Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S64 - S73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Armato III, G. McLennan, M. F. McNitt-Gray, C. R. Meyer, D. Yankelevitz, D. R. Aberle, C. I. Henschke, E. A. Hoffman, E. A. Kazerooni, H. MacMahon, et al. Lung Image Database Consortium: Developing a Resource for the Medical Imaging Research Community Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 739 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]