|
|
||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Cancer Survey, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 1-3-3, Nakamichi, Higashinari, Osaka, 537-8511 Japan.
OBJECTIVE. Our objectives were to propose and evaluate a dynamic sonography protocol for the characterization of hepatic tumors.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The subjects were 107 patients with focal liver lesions that initially had been found on conventional sonograms. The final diagnoses for the lesions were hepatocellular carcinoma in 60 patients, cholangiocellular carcinoma in six, metastatic carcinoma in 24, hemangioma in 10, and focal fat-spared region in seven.
The pulse inversion harmonic imaging mode and a galactose-based contrast agent (Levovist) were used. Dynamic sonography was designed to obtain vascular-phase (composed of the arterial phase and the portal phase) images of the focal lesion and liver-parenchymal-phase images of the whole liver in a series obtained after a bolus injection of the contrast agent.
RESULTS. If the whole-tumor or mosaic enhancement patterns (arterial phase) and/or the reticular enhancement (parenchymal phase) are regarded as positive findings for hepatocellular carcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of dynamic sonography in our study were 92%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. If a ring enhancement (arterial to portal phase) or a clear defect (parenchymal phase) or both are regarded as positive findings for cholangiocellular carcinoma or metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 90%, 95%, and 88%, respectively. If puddle enhancement (portal phase) is regarded as a positive finding for hemangioma, the figures for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 60%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Also, the tumors that showed no focal sign in the liver parenchymal phase were all benign lesions, such as hemangiomas or focal fat-spared regions.
CONCLUSION. Dynamic sonography in a protocol combining pulse inversion harmonic imaging and an IV bolus injection of the contrast agent proved to be an effective tool in characterizing liver tumors.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Catalano, V. Migaleddu, E. Quaia, and G. Caruso Terminology for Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: A Practical Glossary J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 717 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Quaia, A. Palumbo, S. Rossi, F. Degobbis, S. Cernic, G. Tona, and M. Cova Comparison of visual and quantitative analysis for characterization of insonated liver tumors after microbubble contrast injection. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1560 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nicolau, R. Vilana, V. Catala, L. Bianchi, R. Gilabert, A. Garcia, and C. Bru Importance of Evaluating All Vascular Phases on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in the Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Focal Liver Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 158 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ding, W.-P. Wang, B.-J. Huang, R.-X. Wei, N.-A. He, Q. Qi, and C.-L. Li Imaging of Focal Liver Lesions: Low-Mechanical-Index Real-time Ultrasonography With SonoVue J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 285 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ricci, A. Laghi, V. Cantisani, P. Paolantonio, S. Pacella, E. Pagliara, F. Arduini, V. Pasqualini, F. Trippa, M. Filpo, et al. Contrast-Enhanced Sonography with SonoVue: Enhancement Patterns of Benign Focal Liver Lesions and Correlation with Dynamic Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, R. Lobianco, and A. Siani Real-Time Harmonic Contrast Material-specific US of Focal Liver Lesions RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 333 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. von Herbay, C. Vogt, R. Willers, and D. Haussinger Real-time Imaging With the Sonographic Contrast Agent SonoVue: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Hepatic Lesions J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1557 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Quaia, F. Calliada, M. Bertolotto, S. Rossi, L. Garioni, L. Rosa, and R. Pozzi-Mucelli Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions with Contrast-specific US Modes and a Sulfur Hexafluoride-filled Microbubble Contrast Agent: Diagnostic Performance and Confidence Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 420 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Isozaki, K. Numata, T. Kiba, K. Hara, M. Morimoto, T. Sakaguchi, H. Sekihara, T. Kubota, H. Shimada, T. Morizane, et al. Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors by Using Contrast Enhancement Patterns at US Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 798 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Furuse, M Nagase, H Ishii, and M Yoshino Contrast enhancement patterns of hepatic tumours during the vascular phase using coded harmonic imaging and Levovist to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from other focal lesions Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2003; 76(906): 385 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Numata, T. Isozaki, Y. Ozawa, T. Sakaguchi, T. Kiba, T. Kubota, A. Ito, K. Sugimori, K. Shirato, M. Morimoto, et al. Percutaneous Ablation Therapy Guided by Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 143 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Oshikawa, S. Tanaka, T. Ioka, A. Nakaizumi, Y. Hamada, and T. Mitani Dynamic Sonography of Pancreatic Tumors: Comparison with Dynamic CT Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1133 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |