|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Radiology II, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020
Innsbruck, Austria.
2
Department of Radiology, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010
Salzburg, Austria.
3
Department of Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder, 5010 Salzburg,
Austria.
4
Institute of Medical Statistics, University of Vienna, Schwarzspanierstr. 17,
1090 Wien, Austria.
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to determine with sonography whether distinct cross-sectional imaging signs exist that may differentiate between incarcerated and nonincarcerated abdominal wall hernias.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The sonographic appearance of 149 consecutive abdominal wall hernias was prospectively investigated and correlated with subsequent surgical results. Commercially available 4- to 10-MHz linear transducers and 2- to 5-MHz curved transducers were used to evaluate the hernias.
RESULTS. Surgery revealed 126 nonincarcerated and 23 incarcerated hernias. The sonographic signs suggestive of incarceration that we identified included free fluid in the hernia sac, which was observed in 91% of the incarcerated hernias and in 3% of the nonincarcerated hernias; bowel wall thickening in the hernia, which was detected in 88% of the incarcerated hernias and in none of the nonincarcerated hernias; fluid in the herniated bowel loop, which was detected in 82% of the incarcerated hernias and in 3% of the nonincarcerated hernias; and dilated bowel loops in the abdomen, which occurred in 65% of the incarcerated hernias and in none of the nonincarcerated hernias. These imaging findings allowed the identification of incarceration in all 23 cases and led to a false-positive result in two of 126 nonincarcerated hernias.
CONCLUSION. Cross-sectional imaging signs indicating hernial incarceration included free fluid in the hernial sac, bowel wall thickening in the hernia, fluid in the herniated bowel loop, and dilated bowel loops in the abdomen. Sonography is an appropriate cross-sectional imaging modality for detecting these signs that are helpful in diagnosing patients with atypical clinical presentations.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Jamadar, J. A. Jacobson, G. Girish, J. Balin, C. J. Brandon, E. M. Caoili, Y. Morag, and M. G. Franz Abdominal Wall Hernia Mesh Repair: Sonography of Mesh and Common Complications J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 907 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Upponi and H Bungay Imaging of abdominal wall hernias Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 268 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Aguirre, A. C. Santosa, G. Casola, and C. B. Sirlin Abdominal Wall Hernias: Imaging Features, Complications, and Diagnostic Pitfalls at Multi-Detector Row CT RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1501 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Aguirre, G. Casola, and C. Sirlin Abdominal Wall Hernias: MDCT Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 681 - 690. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |