|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, CHUM, Hôpital
Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke St. E., Montréal,
Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada.
2
Department of Radiology, CHUM, Hôpital
Hotel-Dieu de Montréal, University of
Montréal, 3840 St. Urbain, H2W 1T8
Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
3
Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHUM, Hôpital
Hotel-Dieu de Montréal, University of
Montréal, H2W 1T8
Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
4
Department of Medicine, CHUM, Hôpital
Notre-Dame, Montréal, Quebec H2L 4M1,
Canada.
5
Department of Biostatistics, Hotel-Dieu de
Montréal, University of
Montréal,
Montréal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada.
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the value of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for detecting renal artery stenosis.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-one patients with suspected renovascular hypertension were prospectively examined with captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and catheter angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of each technique for detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater and 70% or greater were compared using the McNemar test. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated for populations with 5% and 30% prevalence of renal artery stenosis. Kappa values for interobserver agreement were assessed for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and catheter angiography.
RESULTS. For detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or
greater, the sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (96.6%) was
greater than that of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography (69%, p =
0.005) and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy (41.4%, p = 0.001).
No significant difference in specificity was observed among modalities. For
renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, positive and negative
predictive values were respectively 62% and 86% for captopril-enhanced Doppler
sonography, 49% and 76% for captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and 53% and
98% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Interobserver agreement was high
for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (
= 0.829) and catheter
angiography (
= 0.729).
CONCLUSION. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is the most accurate noninvasive modality for detecting renal artery stenosis greater than or equal to 50%. The use of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography in combination with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for identifying renal artery stenosis needs to be evaluated with a cost-effectiveness analysis.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Soulez, M. Pasowicz, G. Benea, L. Grazioli, J. P. Niedmann, M. Konopka, P. C. Douek, G. Morana, F. K. W. Schaefer, A. Vanzulli, et al. Renal Artery Stenosis Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Angiography--Comparison with DSA Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 273 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Prokop, G. Schneider, A. Vanzulli, M. Goyen, S. G. Ruehm, P. Douek, M. Dapra, G. Pirovano, M. A. Kirchin, and A. Spinazzi Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Blinded Multicenter Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 399 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Accuracy of Screening Tests for Renal Artery Stenosis Journal Watch Cardiology, January 18, 2002; 2002(118): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Accuracy of Screening Tests for Renal Artery Stenosis Journal Watch (General), December 4, 2001; 2001(1204): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |