AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereles, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereles, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 177:1155-1160
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Usefulness of Segmented TrueFISP Cardiac Pulse Sequence in Evaluation of Congenital and Acquired Adult Cardiac Abnormalities

F. S. Pereles1, V. Kapoor1, J. C. Carr1, O. P. Simonetti2, E. A. Krupinski3, V. Baskaran1 and J. P. Finn1

1 Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, 676 N. St. Clair, Ste. 800, Chicago, IL 60611.
2 Siemens Medical Systems, 448 E. Ontario, Ste. 700, Chicago, IL 60611.
3 University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1609 N. Warren, Bldg. 112, Tucson, AZ 85724.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare ultrashort TR, segmented trueFISP (fast imaging with steady-state precession) cine MR imaging with segmented FLASH (fast low-angle shot) cine MR imaging for the detection and characterization of congenital and acquired adult cardiac abnormalities.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-five patients with known or clinically suspected cardiac abnormalities were imaged on a 1.5-T scanner. Valve plane movies were obtained in patients with suspected valve morphology or function abnormalities or whose horizontal long-axis images showed jets. For each patient, three radiologists independently compared corresponding matched cine FLASH and trueFISP movies for image quality in evaluating anatomy and function of the great vessels and heart. Image quality was rated on a five-point scale, and data were analyzed using both a Wilcoxon's signed rank test and a repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS. Image quality ratings of trueFISP and FLASH showed a statistically significant difference (F = 58.67; df = 1, 72; p < 0.0001), with the average rating for the trueFISP images being significantly higher (mean rating, 4.1 ± 0.92) than that for the FLASH images (mean, 3.0 ± 1.0). However, valve architecture in the aortic valves appeared to be better visualized and was more easily measured in valve plane images with FLASH. No statistically significant differences among the ratings of the interpreters (F = 0.018; df = 2, 72; p = 0.9821) were evident, and, therefore, no suggestion of bias was indicated (F = 0.775; df = 1, 2; p = 0.4645). TrueFISP yielded the correct diagnosis prospectively in 13 (100%) of 13 patients, whereas FLASH yielded the correct diagnosis in 12 (92%) of 13 patients.

CONCLUSION. TrueFISP images depict morphologic and functional abnormalities with greater clarity and provide greater diagnostic confidence than FLASH images—and in a fraction of the time. A specific exception is in the assessment of valve leaflet architecture and cross-sectional area calculation (i.e., bicuspid aortic valves); in these evaluations, FLASH maintains a complementary diagnostic imaging role.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A. Crean
Cardiovascular MR and CT in congenital heart disease
Heart, December 1, 2007; 93(12): 1637 - 1647.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Fenchel, R. Saleh, H. Dinh, M. H. Lee, K. Nael, M. Krishnam, S. G. Ruehm, S. Miller, J. Child, and J. P. Finn
Juvenile and Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Time-resolved 3D Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 399 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. K. Mohrs, S. E. Petersen, T. Voigtlaender, J. Peters, B. Nowak, M. K. Heinemann, and H.-U. Kauczor
Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Thorax in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1107 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. Shea, D. S. Fieno, B. E. Schirf, X. Bi, J. Huang, R. A. Omary, and D. Li
T2-prepared Steady-State Free Precession Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MR Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion in a Dog Stenosis Model
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 503 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Baskaran, F. S. Pereles, E. J. Russell, S. A. Georganos, A. Shaibani, K. A. Spero, E. A. Krupinski, A. Zhang, and J. P. Finn
Myelographic MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine with a 3D True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Technique: Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. S. Pereles, R. M. McCarthy, V. Baskaran, J. C. Carr, V. Kapoor, E. A. Krupinski, and J. P. Finn
Thoracic Aortic Dissection and Aneurysm: Evaluation with Nonenhanced True FISP MR Angiography in Less than 4 Minutes
Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 270 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.