AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soo, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soo, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 177:1167-1170
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Negative Predictive Value of Sonography with Mammography in Patients with Palpable Breast Lesions

Mary Scott Soo1, Eric L. Rosen1, Jay A. Baker1, Thuy T. Vo1,2 and Blythe Ann Boyd1,3

1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3808, Rm. 24244B, Durham, NC 27710.
2 Present address: East Valley Diagnostic Imaging, 1125 E. Southern Ave., Ste. 300, Mesa, AZ 85212.
3 Present address: 72 E. 7th St., Apt. 1C, New York, NY 10003.

OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to determine the negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in evaluating palpable breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four hundred twenty patients with 455 palpable breast lesions were retrospectively identified from our mammography database as having negative mammographic and sonographic results. For patients diagnosed with breast cancer, images and medical records were reviewed to determine whether the palpable lesion evaluated on sonography and mammography corresponded to the patient's breast cancer. On the basis of the number of breast cancers that correlated to the palpable areas imaged, the negative predictive value of sonography with mammography was determined.

RESULTS. Sixty-two of the 420 patients in the study group were already diagnosed with breast carcinoma, and eight new carcinomas were diagnosed during the study period. Only one of six ipsilateral cancers corresponded to a palpable lesion that had a negative imaging evaluation. This lesion was diagnosed as an invasive lobular cancer, hard and fixed at physical examination. Imaging and clinical follow-up of the remaining patients showed no abnormality at the sites of previously investigated palpable abnormalities. The mean imaging follow-up was 25 months. The negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in the setting of a palpable lesion was 99.8%.

CONCLUSION. The negative predictive value of sonography with mammography is high, and together these imaging modalities can be reassuring if follow-up is planned when the physical examination is not highly suspicious. However, if the physical examination is suspicious, biopsy should not be delayed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Y. Kwak, E.-K. Kim, H.-L. Park, J.-Y. Kim, and K. K. Oh
Application of the breast imaging reporting and data system final assessment system in sonography of palpable breast lesions and reconsideration of the modified triple test.
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2006; 25(10): 1255 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. J. Santen and R. Mansel
Benign Breast Disorders
N. Engl. J. Med., July 21, 2005; 353(3): 275 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Graf, T. H. Helbich, M. H. Fuchsjaeger, G. Hopf, M. Morgun, C. Graf, R. Mallek, and E. A. Sickles
Follow-up of Palpable Circumscribed Noncalcified Solid Breast Masses at Mammography and US: Can Biopsy Be Averted?
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 850 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Majid, E. S. de Paredes, R. D. Doherty, N. R. Sharma, and X. Salvador
Missed Breast Carcinoma: Pitfalls and Pearls
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 881 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. K. Shetty, Y. P. Shah, and R. S. Sharman
Prospective Evaluation of the Value of Combined Mammographic and Sonographic Assessment in Patients With Palpable Abnormalities of the Breast
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2003; 22(3): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. K. Shetty and Y. P. Shah
Prospective Evaluation of the Value of Negative Sonographic and Mammographic Findings in Patients With Palpable Abnormalities of the Breast
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2002; 21(11): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. M. Hall, M. S. Soo, E. L. Rosen, and J. A. Baker
Negative Predictive Value of Breast Imaging in Patients with Palpable Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 1073 - 1074.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Hall and S. S. Kaplan
Screening Breast US * Dr Kaplan responds:
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 930 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. W. T. Leung, P. J. Kornguth, and M. B. Gotway
Utility of Targeted Sonography in the Evaluation of Focal Breast Pain
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 521 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.