AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahesh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahesh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:1273-1275
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Dose and Pitch Relationship for a Particular Multislice CT Scanner

Mahadevappa Mahesh1, John C. Scatarige1, Joseph Cooper2 and Elliot K. Fishman1

1 The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St., Baltimore, MD 21287-0811.
2 Siemens Medical Systems, 186 Wood Ave. S., Iselin, NJ 08830.

OBJECTIVE. With single-slice helical CT, an increased pitch can decrease the radiation dose to the patient if all other parameters are constant. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the same relationship holds for a particular multislice helical CT system (Somatom Plus 4 VZ multislice helical CT scanner, version A11A) in our department.

CONCLUSION. The measured radiation dose to the phantom was identical for all pitch selections on the multislice helical CT system we tested. This unexpected result was because of an automatic proportionate increase in the tube current when the pitch selection was increased. Radiologists and physicists should exercise caution when extrapolating dose reduction strategies from single-slice to multislice helical CT systems, and they must acquire a detailed understanding of the multislice helical CT scanner of their chosen manufacturer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Gavrielides, L. M. Kinnard, K. J. Myers, and N. Petrick
Noncalcified Lung Nodules: Volumetric Assessment with Thoracic CT
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 26 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
L. W. Goldman
Principles of CT: Multislice CT
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2008; 36(2): 57 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Kim, K. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, H.-r. Kim, and Y. H. Kim
Artifacts in Slab Average-Intensity-Projection Images Reformatted from JPEG 2000 Compressed Thin-Section Abdominal CT Data Sets
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W342 - W350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu
Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. t. Rijdt, B. Kegelaers, and J.-L. Termote
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2007; 28(8): 1444 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Woo, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, S. Hahn, B. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and K. H. Lee
JPEG 2000 Compression of Abdominal CT: Difference in Tolerance Between Thin- and Thick-Section Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 535 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Mahesh and D. D. Cody
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Physics of Cardiac Imaging with Multiple-Row Detector CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1495 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Bohy, V. de Maertelaer, A. Roquigny, C. Keyzer, D. Tack, and P. A. Gevenois
Multidetector CT in Patients Suspected of Having Lumbar Disk Herniation: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 524 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Madani, V. De Maertelaer, J. Zanen, and P. A. Gevenois
Pulmonary Emphysema: Radiation Dose and Section Thickness at Multidetector CT Quantification--Comparison with Macroscopic and Microscopic Morphometry
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 250 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. A. Bankier, C. Schaefer-Prokop, V. De Maertelaer, D. Tack, P. Jaksch, W. Klepetko, and P. A. Gevenois
Air Trapping: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Thin-Section CT Techniques
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 898 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. H. Mulkens, S. Daineffe, R. De Wijngaert, P. Bellinck, A. Leonard, G. Smet, and J.-L. Termote
Urinary Stone Disease: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Low-Dose with 4D MDCT Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 553 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Rothkamm, S. Balroop, J. Shekhdar, P. Fernie, and V. Goh
Leukocyte DNA Damage after Multi-Detector Row CT: A Quantitative Biomarker of Low-Level Radiation Exposure
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 244 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. M. Hurwitz, T. T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. T. Nguyen, G. I. Toncheva, and P. C. Goodman
Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1718 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Parker, F. K. Hui, M. A. Camacho, J. K. Chung, D. W. Broga, and N. N. Sethi
Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1228 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. H. Mulkens, P. Bellinck, M. Baeyaert, D. Ghysen, X. Van Dijck, E. Mussen, C. Venstermans, and J.-L. Termote
Use of an Automatic Exposure Control Mechanism for Dose Optimization in Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Clinical Evaluation
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Tack, P. Bohy, I. Perlot, V. De Maertelaer, O. Alkeilani, S. Sourtzis, and P. A. Gevenois
Suspected Acute Colon Diverticulitis: Imaging with Low-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 189 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Keyzer, M. Zalcman, V. De Maertelaer, E. Coppens, M.-A. Bali, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke
Comparison of US and Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of having Acute Appendicitis
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Tack, V. De Maertelaer, W. Petit, P. Scillia, P. Muller, C. Suess, and P. A. Gevenois
Multi-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 318 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. E. van Gelder, H. W. Venema, J. Florie, C. Y. Nio, I. W. O. Serlie, M. P. Schutter, J. C. van Rijn, F. M. Vos, A. S. Glas, P. M. M. Bossuyt, et al.
CT Colonography: Feasibility of Substantial Dose Reduction--Comparison of Medium to Very Low Doses in Identical Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 611 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Keyzer, D. Tack, V. de Maertelaer, P. Bohy, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke
Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 164 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini
Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, J. Widelec, V. De Maertelaer, J.-M. Bailly, C. Delcour, and P. A. Gevenois
Comparison Between Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Patients with Suspected Chronic Sinusitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 939 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, V. De Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois
Dose Reduction in Multidetector CT Using Attenuation-Based Online Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 331 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. K. Gupta, R. C. Nelson, G. A. Johnson, E. K. Paulson, D. M. Delong, and T. T. Yoshizumi
Optimization of Eight-Element Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Technology for Evaluation of the Abdomen
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 739 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, S. Sourtzis, I. Delpierre, V. de Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois
Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 305 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. S. Katz, N. Venkataramanan, S. Napel, and F. G. Sommer
Can Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT Be Used for Routine Evaluation of Suspected Renal Colic?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 313 - 315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. F. McNitt-Gray
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Radiation Dose in CT
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1541 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Mahesh
The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Search for Isotropic Resolution in CT from Conventional through Multiple-Row Detector
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 949 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.