AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darge, K.
Right arrow Articles by Troeger, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darge, K.
Right arrow Articles by Troeger, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:1411-1415
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Pediatric Patients

Kassa Darge1, Birgit Zieger, Wiltrud Rohrschneider, Susan Ghods, Rainer Wunsch and Jochen Troeger

1 All authors: Department of Pediatric Radiology, Radiological Clinic, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 153, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. Harmonic imaging using phase or pulse inversion technology is a new sonographic diagnostic modality that has the potential to produce images of a higher quality than can be obtained with the conventional method. The aim of this study was to compare both types of harmonic modalities—tissue and contrast harmonic imaging—with the fundamental imaging mode in contrast-enhanced B-mode sonographic diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-four children presenting for diagnostic examination of vesicoureteral reflux underwent standard sonography of the urinary tract in the fundamental mode, followed by intravesical administration of a galactose-based contrast medium containing microbubbles. The contrast-enhanced sonography was conducted by scanning the bladder and each kidney in transverse and longitudinal planes, from ventral and dorsal views, consecutively in B-mode using fundamental, contrast harmonic, and tissue harmonic imaging modalities. Soft-touch buttons on the console screen were used to alternate between the three imaging options, so that switching from one modality to the other could be done almost instantaneously. For comparison, in each patient, we selected one set of contrast-enhanced images of the bladder and two sets, one ventral and one dorsal, of the kidney. In a series, the images were compared and ranked from 1 to 3, with 1 being the best, with regard to sonomorphology (demarcation of the retrovesical space and renal pelvis as the potential sites to look for vesicoureteral reflux) and reflux detection and conspicuity, if present.

RESULTS. In all, 248 sets of images were available for comparison. The delineation of both the retrovesical space and the renal pelvis was found to be best with tissue harmonic imaging in 84% and 96% of the image sets, respectively (p < 0.01). Forty-one sets of images were compared from 27 kidney-ureter image units of 22 children (41%) with reflux. The refluxing microbubbles were much more conspicuous in the harmonic imaging mode (tissue harmonic, 100%; contrast harmonic, 93%) than in the fundamental mode (p < 0.01). In eight kidney-ureter units, the reflux was detected only by using the harmonic imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION. Visualization of the urinary tract and detection of ultrasound contrast media is significantly improved by the use of the harmonic imaging modalities. When both fundamental and harmonic imaging options are available, we recommend harmonic imaging for contrast-enhanced sonographic diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. L. Valentini, A. M. De Gaetano, L. M. Minordi, G. Nanni, F. Citterio, A. M. Viggiano, V. Tancioni, and C. Destito
Contrast-enhanced Voiding US for Grading of Reflux in Adult Patients Prior to Antireflux Ureteral Implantation
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 35 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Riccabona, A. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, E. Ring, C. Maier, L. Lusuardi, and M. Riccabona
Potential Impact of Pediatric MR Urography on the Imaging Algorithm in Patients with a Functional Single Kidney
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 795 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.