| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S. 11th
St., Rm. 3390 Gibbon, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
2
Present address: FMH Diagnostische Radiologie, Oberer Batterieweg 57, 4059
Basel, Switzerland.
OBJECTIVE. We studied the frequency, location, extent, and signal characteristics of nonenhancing tissue in pedal infections and correlated those areas with surgical and histologic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred ten contrast-enhanced 1.5-T MR imaging foot examinations in 102 patients (28 women, 74 men; mean age, 59 years), 82% of whom had diabetes mellitus, were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists for the presence of areas without recognizable enhancement. The number, size, location, signal characteristics, and enhancement ratio of nonenhancing regions were noted. MR imaging findings were compared with surgical and histology reports.
RESULTS. Nonenhancing regions were found in 27 feet (24.5%, 96.3% in diabetic patients, p = 0.032) at the forefoot (n = 16), toes (n = 8), and heel (n = 3). The mean size of the nonenhancing regions was 4.1 x 2.7 x 1.4 cm. Signal characteristics on T1-weighted images were isointense to muscle (n = 21, 77.8%), hypointense to muscle (n = 3, 11.1%), heterogeneous (n = 2, 7.4%), and isointense to fat (n = 1, 3.7%). On T2-weighted images, the signal was hyperintense to muscle (n = 12, 44.4%), heterogeneous to muscle (n = 9, 33.3%), equal to fluid (n = 3, 11.1%), and hypointense to muscle (n = 3, 11.1%). The mean signal increase after contrast administration was 3.57% for observer 1 and 2.68% for observer 2. Necrotic tissue was surgically confirmed in the nonenhancing areas in 26 feet (96.3%). Five abscesses and three cases of osteomyelitis were misdiagnosed on MR images because of lack of enhancement.
CONCLUSION. Nonenhancing areas are seen in one fourth of pedal infections, occur almost exclusively in diabetic patients, and represent necrotic tissue. Only contrast-enhanced images allow reliable recognition of these regions. Lack of enhancement in these areas can mask the presence of abscess and osteomyelitis.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. C. Roberts, W. B. Morrison, and P. T. Liu Imaging Evaluation of Foot and Ankle Pathology: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3_Supplement): S18 - S22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P L Tan and J Teh MRI of the diabetic foot: differentiation of infection from neuropathic change Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 939 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kapoor, S. Page, M. LaValley, D. R. Gale, and D. T. Felson Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Foot Osteomyelitis: A Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 125 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. V. Salgami, F. L. Bowling, R. W. Whitehouse, and A. J. M. Boulton Charcot neuroarthropathy: an unusual case and a review of the literature. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 207 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. A. Lipsky, A. R. Berendt, H. G. Deery, J. M. Embil, W. S. Joseph, A. W. Karchmer, J. L. LeFrock, D. P. Lew, J. T. Mader, C. Norden, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2005; 95(2): 183 - 210. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. Bloem, T. J. Mosher, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, H. P. Ledermann, W. B. Morrison, and M. E. Schweitzer Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging in Bone Marrow Disorders [letter] * Dr Mosher responds: * Drs Schmid and Zanetti respond: * Dr Ledermann and colleagues respond: Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 303 - 305. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
