AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levin, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pentecost, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levin, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pentecost, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:303-306
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Cardiovascular Imaging

Who Does It and How Important Is It to the Practice of Radiology?

David C. Levin1, Laurence Parker1, Jonathan H. Sunshine2 and Michael J. Pentecost3

1 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S. 11th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107.
2 American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr., Reston, VA 20191.
3 Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Rd. N.W., Washington, DC 20007.

OBJECTIVE. Our research was conducted to ascertain the importance of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging to the practice of radiology and to determine what percentages of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging are performed by radiologists and by other types of physicians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using the national 1998 Medicare Part B database, we reviewed all 460 procedure codes pertaining to noninvasive diagnostic imaging and identified 65 that were specifically related to the cardiovascular system. These 65 codes were grouped in five categories: cardiac MR imaging, MR angiography, cardiovascular nuclear medicine, echocardiography, and vascular sonography. For each code and category, we determined the nationwide examination volume, the utilization rate per 1,000 Medicare fee-for-service enrollees, Part B physician reimbursements, and the percentages of examinations performed by radiologists, cardiologists, surgeons, and other physicians.

RESULTS. During 1998, 19,244,001 noninvasive cardiovascular imaging studies were performed on Medicare enrollees, which accounted for 17.7% of all Medicare diagnostic imaging studies carried out that year and 33.6% of all Part B imaging-related reimbursements paid. The utilization rate for noninvasive cardiovascular imaging was 603 per 1,000 Medicare enrollees per year. Echocardiography alone accounted for 63.4% of these examinations. Radiologists conducted 16.7% of all noninvasive cardiovascular imaging, whereas cardiologists conducted 61.5%, surgeons 4.8%, and other physicians 16.9% of the examinations. The strong role of cardiologists was largely attributable to their dominance in echocardiography. Radiologists had a substantial role in all categories except echocardiography.

CONCLUSION. Noninvasive cardiovascular imaging represents an important component of the practice of radiology. Radiologists have substantial participation in all aspects of the field with the exception of echocardiography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Cardiac Imaging: Radiologists Prepare, Participate, and Publish
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1271 - 1271.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. J. Shaw, D. Polk, and C. N. Bairey Merz
Assessing Mature Technology: What Is the Effect of High-Quality Risk Stratification Evidence With Exercise Echocardiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 238 - 239.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
S. N. BHRIAIN, A. W. CLARE, and B. A. LAWLOR
Neuroimaging: a new training issue in psychiatry?
Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2005; 29(5): 189 - 192.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Maitino, D. C. Levin, L. Parker, V. M. Rao, and J. H. Sunshine
Practice Patterns of Radiologists and Nonradiologists in Utilization of Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging among the Medicare Population 1993-1999
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Maitino, D. C. Levin, L. Parker, V. M. Rao, and J. H. Sunshine
Nationwide Trends in Rates of Utilization of Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging among the Medicare Population between 1993 and 1999
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 113 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. P. Sanders, S. B. Yeon, J. Grunes, T. B. Seto, and W. J. Manning
Impact of a Specific Echocardiographic Report Comment Regarding Endocarditis Prophylaxis on Compliance With American Heart Association Recommendations
Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 300 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.