AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rydzewski, B.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rydzewski, B.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:353-358
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Usefulness of Intraoperative Sonography for Revealing Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer in Patients Selected for Surgery After Undergoing FDG PET

Bartosz Rydzewski1, Farrokh Dehdashti1,2, Brigid A. Gordon1, Sharlene A. Teefey1, Steven M. Strasberg2,3 and Barry A. Siegel1,2

1 Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110.
2 Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
3 Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG and intraoperative sonography with the standard of histologic examination of resected liver specimens in evaluating patients for curative resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified 47 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer who underwent surgical exploration for possible curative resection of hepatic metastases. All patients underwent CT or MR imaging and FDG PET preoperatively and intraoperative sonography. The performance of the imaging techniques was evaluated through review of the radiologic reports and correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings.

RESULTS. Eighty-seven malignant hepatic lesions were identified by histopathologic analysis of liver specimens, and 23 benign hepatic abnormalities were documented histopathologically or by uroradiologic imaging. For hepatic sections characterized as containing metastases by radiologic imaging, the positive predictive value for FDG PET was 93% (54/58); for intraoperative sonography, 87% (52/60); and for conventional imaging, 83% (43/52). For individual lesions characterized as probably malignant, the positive predictive value for FDG PET was 93% (62/68); for intraoperative sonography, 89% (63/71); and for conventional imaging, 78% (46/59). The findings at intraoperative sonography led to a change in the clinical treatment of only one patient (2%).

CONCLUSION. The results indicate that FDG PET effectively screens potential candidates for curative liver resection. Although intraoperative sonography helps to determine the anatomic location of metastases thus facilitating surgical resection, its adjunctive use in patients screened preoperatively by FDG PET has limited impact on treatment selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
B. Wiering, T. J. M. Ruers, P. F. M. Krabbe, H. M. Dekker, and W. J. G. Oyen
Comparison of Multiphase CT, FDG-PET and Intra-Operative Ultrasound in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Selected for Surgery
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 818 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
O J Garden, M Rees, G J Poston, D Mirza, M Saunders, J Ledermann, J N Primrose, and R W Parks
Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases
Gut, August 1, 2006; 55(suppl_3): iii1 - iii8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. B. Kruskal and R. A. Kane
Intraoperative US of the Liver: Techniques and Clinical Applications.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 1067 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. P. Khatri, N. J. Petrelli, and J. Belghiti
Extending the Frontiers of Surgical Therapy for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Is There a Limit?
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8490 - 8499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, M. S. van Leeuwen, E. F. I. Comans, M. E. J. Pijl, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. Stoker
Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis--Meta-analysis
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al.
Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2785 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
U. Prati, F. Trotta, L. Roveda, C. Filice, F. Dehdashti, S. M. Strasberg, and B. A. Siegel
Intraoperative Sonography Still the Standard Technique in Hepatic Surgery
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179 (5): 1347 - 1348.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.