AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herts, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herts, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:367-372
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Enhancement Characteristics of Papillary Renal Neoplasms Revealed on Triphasic Helical CT of the Kidneys

Brian R. Herts1, Deirdre M. Coll1,2, Andrew C. Novick3, Nancy Obuchowski1,4, Grant Linnell1, Susan L. Wirth1 and Mark E. Baker1

1 Department of Radiology-H66, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Weill Hospital, Cornell University Medical Center, 525 E. 68th St., New York, NY 10021.
3 Urological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195.
4 Department of Biostatistics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether renal tumor enhancement or heterogeneity on triphasic helical CT scans is predictive of the papillary cell subtype or nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the CT scans of 90 consecutive patients with renal masses who had undergone triphasic renal helical CT before a complete or partial nephrectomy (12 with papillary renal cell carcinomas, 66 with nonpapillary renal cell carcinomas, and 12 with benign lesions). Three radiologists who were unaware of the patients' diagnoses retrospectively and independently measured the attenuation of each patient's tumor, abdominal aorta, and normal renal parenchyma on the scans obtained during all three phases. Ratios of tumor-to-aorta enhancement and tumor-to-normal renal parenchyma enhancement were calculated for both of the phases performed after contrast material had been administered. Tumor heterogeneity was calculated as the difference between the highest and lowest attenuation values divided by the value of the enhancement of the aorta. Values were correlated with cell type and nuclear grade found at surgical pathology.

RESULTS. Low tumor-to-aorta enhancement and low tumor-to-normal renal parenchyma enhancement ratios on the vascular phase scans significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with papillary renal cell type carcinoma. Homogeneity and tumor-to-parenchyma enhancement ratios on the parenchymal phase scans also significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with papillary renal cell type carcinoma. Heterogeneity and tumor enhancement ratios did not correlate with the nuclear grade of the carcinoma.

CONCLUSION. Papillary renal cell carcinomas are typically hypovascular and homogeneous. A high tumor-to-parenchyma enhancement ratio (>=25%) essentially excludes the possibility of a tumor being papillary renal cell carcinoma. A low tumor-to-aorta enhancement ratio or tumor-to-normal renal parenchyma enhancement ratio is more likely to indicate papillary renal cell carcinoma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J M Garin, I Marco, A Salva, F Serrano, J M Bondia, and M Pacheco
CT and MRI in fat-containing papillary renal cell carcinoma
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): e193 - e195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, R. A. Lefkowitz, N. M. Ishill, L. Wang, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Russo, H. Eisenberg, and H. Hricak
Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S R Prasad, V R Narra, R Shah, P A Humphrey, J Jagirdar, J R Catena, N C Dalrymple, and C L Siegel
Segmental disorders of the nephron: histopathological and imaging perspective
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. R. Prasad, P. A. Humphrey, J. R. Catena, V. R. Narra, J. R. Srigley, A. D. Cortez, N. C. Dalrymple, and K. N. Chintapalli
Common and Uncommon Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Spectrum with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1795 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Wang, P. Q. Min, P. J. Wang, W. X. Cheng, X. H. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. H. Zhao, and X. Q. Mao
Dynamic CT Evaluation of Tumor Vascularity in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1423 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak
How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Weinstein, N. A. Obuchowski, and M. L. Lieber
Clinical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 14 - 19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. Uggowitzer, T. Meissnitzer, and G. Ruppert
Differentiation of Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Renal Papillary Carcinoma Using Quantitative CT Enhancement Parameters
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1387 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. S. Hartman, P. L. Choyke, and M. S. Hartman
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: A Practical Approach to the Cystic Renal Mass
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S101 - S115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. P. Chung, B. R. Herts, G. Linnell, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, D. M. Coll, and M. E. Baker
Analysis of Changes in Attenuation of Proven Renal Cysts on Different Scanning Phases of Triphasic MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 405 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Lesavre, J.-M. Correas, S. Merran, N. Grenier, A. Vieillefond, and O. Helenon
CT of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas with Cholesterol Necrosis Mimicking Angiomyolipomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 143 - 145.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak
Calcification in Cystic Renal Masses: Is It Important in Diagnosis?
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Abdulla, M. K. Kalra, S. Saini, M. M. Maher, A. Ahmad, E. Halpern, and S. G. Silverman
Pseudoenhancement of Simulated Renal Cysts in a Phantom Using Different Multidetector CT Scanners
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1473 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.