AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cooil, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cooil, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 178:497-502
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Calcium Scoring of the Coronary Artery by Electron Beam CT

How to Apply an Individual Attenuation Threshold

Paolo Raggi1, Tracy Q. Callister2 and Bruce Cooil3

1 Tulane University School of Medicine, Cardiology Section, SL48, 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112.
2 EBT Research Foundation, 353 New Shackle Island Rd., Hendersonville, TN 37025.
3 Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, 401 21st Ave. S. Nashville, TN 37203.

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to assess the inter- and intraindividual variability of the attenuation threshold used to identify coronary artery calcification on electron beam CT and to illustrate a new threshold method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We measured the soft-tissue attenuation of regions surrounding the coronary arteries at the level of the left main coronary artery ostium (high level) and at the bottom of the heart (low level) in 48 consecutive patients (22 men, 26 women). Mean ± 2 standard deviations (SD) of soft-tissue attenuation and variance of soft-tissue density and SDs were calculated at each level for every patient. It was assumed that setting an attenuation threshold greater than or equal to 3 SDs above that of soft tissue at each myocardial level would eliminate 99.5% of all scatter artifacts, allowing precise identification of calcific deposits.

RESULTS. For the entire patient cohort, the average soft-tissue attenuation was 41 H and 35 H at the high and low levels, respectively (p < 0.01), indicating a large intraindividual variability. The SDs of soft-tissue attenuation measured by the computer software at the high and low levels were not different (26 H at the high level and 28 H at the low level; p = not significant). However, the calculated SD of the individual mean soft-tissue attenuation was 5 H at the high level and 8 H at the low level, again indicating a large intraindividual variability (p < 0.01). The addition of 3 measured SDs above the mean individual soft-tissue attenuation predicted a mean threshold of 120 and 121 H at the high and low levels, respectively, but with a wide interindividual variability (83-193 H at the high level and 79-242 H at the low level). There was a strong correlation between body weight and SD of soft-tissue attenuation at the low level (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) and a weaker but statistically significant correlation between weight and SD of soft-tissue attenuation at the high level (r = 0.51, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION. For the patients in this study, a threshold of 120 H for the detection of coronary calcification by electron beam CT seemed more appropriate than a threshold of 130 H, which is currently in use. However, given the great inter- and intraindividual variability, a biologic threshold tailored to the individual patient and to each individual imaging level should be used instead of a fixed threshold.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Chung, R. L. McClelland, R. Katz, J. J. Carr, and M. J. Budoff
Repeatability Limits for Measurement of Coronary Artery Calcified Plaque with Cardiac CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): W87 - W92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Dey, T. Callister, P. Slomka, F. Aboul-Enein, H. Nishina, X. Kang, H. Gransar, N. D. Wong, R. Miranda-Peats, S. Hayes, et al.
Computer-Aided Detection and Evaluation of Lipid-Rich Plaque on Noncontrast Cardiac CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S407 - S413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. K. Agatisa, K. A. Matthews, J. T. Bromberger, D. Edmundowicz, Y.-F. Chang, and K. Sutton-Tyrrell
Coronary and Aortic Calcification in Women With a History of Major Depression
Arch Intern Med, June 13, 2005; 165(11): 1229 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. C. Nelson, R. A. Kronmal, J. J. Carr, M. F. McNitt-Gray, N. D. Wong, C. M. Loria, J. G. Goldin, O. D. Williams, and R. Detrano
Measuring Coronary Calcium on CT Images Adjusted for Attenuation Differences
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 403 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, T. K. Pilgram, F. Zhu, and K. T. Bae
Coronary Artery Calcification: Effect of Size of Field of View on Multi-Detector Row CT Measurements
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 281 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Jain, R. Peshock, D. K. McGuire, D. Willett, Z. Yu, G. L. Vega, R. Guerra, H. H. Hobbs, S. M. Grundy, and the Dallas Heart Study Investigators
African Americans and Caucasians have a similar prevalence of coronary calcium in the Dallas Heart Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1011 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Stanford, T. L. Burns, B. H. Thompson, J. D. Witt, R. M. Lauer, and L. T. Mahoney
Influence of Body Size and Section Level on Calcium Phantom Measurements at Coronary Artery Calcium CT Scanning
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 198 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. Hoffmann, D. C. Kwait, J. Handwerker, R. Chan, G. Lamuraglia, and T. J. Brady
Vascular Calcification in ex Vivo Carotid Specimens: Precision and Accuracy of Measurements with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 375 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, K. T. Bae, and T. K. Pilgram
Coronary Artery Calcium: Accuracy and Reproducibility of Measurements with Multi-Detector Row CT—Assessment of Effects of Different Thresholds and Quantification Methods
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, K. T. Bae, T. K. Pilgram, J. Suh, and D. Bradley
Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement with Multi-Detector Row CT: In Vitro Assessment of Effect of Radiation Dose
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.