HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carr, J. C. Articles by Finn, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carr, J. C. Articles by Finn, J. P. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

High-Resolution Breath-Hold Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Entire Carotid Circulation

¹ Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, 676 St. Clair St., 8th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611.
² Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611.
³ Siemens Research and Development, 448 E. Ontario St., Chicago, IL 60611.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of breathing on image quality of the aortic arch and carotid vessels during contrast-enhanced MR angiography and to show that high-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography combined with a timing-bolus technique can produce high-quality images of the entire carotid circulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty patients underwent high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography on a 1.5-T Magnetom Symphony. A coronal three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE, 4.36/1.64; flip angle, 25°) with asymmetric k-space acquisition was used. The 136 x 512 matrix yielded voxel sizes of 1.33 x 0.64 x 1.0 mm. A timing-bolus acquisition, orientated in the coronal plane to include the aortic arch, was obtained initially during free-breathing. Twenty milliliters of gadopenetate dimeglumine was injected at 2 mL/sec. Unenhanced and enhanced 3D volumes were recorded. A subtracted 3D set was calculated and subjected to a maximum-intensity-projection algorithm. Half of the patients held their breath during angiography and the other half did not. Aortic arch motion was measured on the timing-bolus acquisition as the distance moved by a single pixel in both the x and y directions. Maximum-intensity-projection MR images were assessed independently by two observers, and vessel sharpness was scored on a scale of 1-5. Sharpness was also assessed quantitatively by generating a signal intensity profile across the aortic arch vessel wall and calculating the average of the upslope and downslope at full-width half maximum. Visualization of carotid branch vessels was scored on a scale of 0-5, and venous contamination was scored on a scale of 0-3.

RESULTS. Average in-plane aortic arch movement was 10.3 mm in the x direction and 8.7 mm in the y direction. Quantitative and qualitative sharpness of the aortic arch and great vessel origins was better (p < 0.05) during breath-holding than during non—breath-holding. No difference in the sharpness of the carotid vessels was noted between the two groups. Carotid branch vessels were well visualized from the aortic arch to the intracerebral circulation. The average venous contamination score was 0.56.

CONCLUSION. Breath-holding greatly improves the sharpness of the aortic arch and great vessel origins but has no effect on visualization of the carotid vessels. High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography can produce high-quality, artifact-free images of the entire carotid circulation from the aortic arch to the intracerebral circulation.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R.S. Saleh, D.G. Lohan, J.P. Villablanca, G. Duckwiler, S.T. Kee, and J.P. Finn Assessment of Craniospinal Arteriovenous Malformations at 3T with Highly Temporally and Highly Spatially Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1024 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Groves, W. Bireley, K. Dill, T. J. Carroll, and J. C. Carr Quantitative Analysis of ECG-Gated High-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Thoracic Aorta Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 522 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nael, J. P. Villablanca, W. B. Pope, T. O. McNamara, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn Supraaortic Arteries: Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography at 3.0 T--Highly Accelerated Parallel Acquisition for Improved Spatial Resolution over an Extended Field of View Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 600 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Yang, J. C. Carr, S. F. Futterer, M. D. Morasch, B. P. Yang, S. M. Shors, and J. P. Finn Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2095 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Wu, J. Zhang, C. J. Ladner, J. S. Babb, P. J. Lamparello, and G. A. Krinsky Subclavian Steal Syndrome: Diagnosis with Perfusion Metrics from Contrast-enhanced MR Angiographic Bolus-timing Examination--Initial Experience Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Krinsky Evaluation of Arch Vessels: Breath-hold versus Non-Breath-hold Techniques [letter] Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 303 - 304. [Full Text] [PDF]